Skip to main content

THE CITY OFFICIALLY REJECTED THE REZONING PROPOSAL!! WE WON THIS FIGHT AND KEPT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL!! THANK YOU TO EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU FOR PROTECTING OUR STREETS FROM THIS MASSIVE DEVELOPMENT!!!

July 7, 2021

Commercial Rezoning of 1465 Corydon and 492 Queenston

Commercial Rezoning of 1465 Corydon and 492 Queenston

🏆 Won — 209 supporters Verified

Final supporters

L
Lindsey C.
B
Benjamin G.
K
ken k.
C
carolyn k.
H
Henry
E
Elaine
L
Laura
J
Johnny D.
J
John
S
Shelley
+199 more
JL
Started by Jeremy Langemann 5 years, 4 months ago

Petition in opposition of the proposed rezoning and consolidation of lots, and commercial development at 1465 Corydon Avenue & 492 Queenston Street:

Subdivision and Rezoning – DASZ7/20201

Change 492 Queenston Street from Residential Single-Family to Commercial Neighbourhood District

Consolidate with 1465 Corydon Avenue and build a Multi-Tenant Commercial building

Build a parking lot

ONCE THE TWO PROPERTIES ARE COMBINED – VARY DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS – Variance – DAV 21-108253/D

For the commercial building – Reduce the front yard on Queenston Street from 30 feet to 12 feet

For the commercial building – Change and allow insufficient street edge landscaping along Corydon Avenue

For the parking lot – Reduce the front yard on Queenston Street from 30 feet to 11 feet

For the parking lot – Reduce the north side yard on Queenston Street from 10 feet to 4 feet

Allow a pedestrian route that does not meet the pedestrian connection design standards

Conditional Use – DCU 21-108312/D

Allow a commercial building exceeding 5,000 square feet in floor area

Points of opposition

Out of Character

  • The proposed building will not resemble a residential building in scale or design, a key condition of the original rezoning agreement.
  • Homeowners expect the character of the buildings to be maintained.

Contrary to Current Restricted Use and Zoning Agreement Caveats

  • Required:
    • Maintain and no changes to the single-family dwelling at 494 Queenston Street.
    • 1465 Corydon Avenue at the rear of the single-family dwelling at 494 Queenston Street, to be used only as a general insurance and automobile insurance agency.
  • The approved building plans maintained residential lines of sight on Queenston Street and neighbourhood character.
  • To this day, the use of the buildings is restricted to the sole purpose of a general insurance and automobile insurance agency. This fact is absent from the posted notice.
  • Residents of River Heights do not want the use of the buildings for other than the sole purpose of a general insurance and automobile insurance agency, and do not want buildings that do not maintain residential lines of sight and neighborhood character.

Precedence for Changes to the Character of Commercial Nodes

  • Residents of River Heights do not want commercial property (including parking lots) facing their residential properties.

Encroachment and Lines of Sight

  • Residents and homeowners do not want to be looking at the side of a commercial building.
  • Reduced lines of sight from Corydon Avenue down Queenston Street puts all our safety at risk. Residents do not want this.

Parking Lots

  • Residents of River Heights do not want residential buildings torn down for parking lots.

Access from and Egress onto Queenston Street

  • Residents of River Heights do not want parking lots accessed by residential streets.

Property Value

  • Residents of River Heights do not want a depreciation in their property values.

On-Street Parking

  • Residents on Queenston Street and surrounding streets do not want more competition for parking.

Vehicle Collisions

  • Many serious collisions occur at the intersection of Corydon and Queenston.
  • More traffic will result in more collisions.

Queenston Traffic

  • Residents of River Heights do not want more commercial traffic cutting through the residential neighborhood.

Heavy Traffic

  • Residents of River Heights do not want increased traffic and its associated risks.

Alley Traffic

  • Residents of River Heights do not want more commercial traffic cutting through the residential neighborhood.

Safety of Our Children

Teacher and Parent Parking and Student Drop-Off and Pick-up on Corydon Avenue and Queenston Street

  • Residents of River Heights do not want increased commercial traffic and commercial parking putting our children’s safety at risk.

Sidewalk Interference

  • Residents do not want vehicle interference in the pedestrian nature of the neighborhood.
  • Residents do not want sidewalks that do not meet design standards.

Mature Trees

  • Residents of River Heights do not want beautiful, mature, and healthy trees cut down or damaged.
  • Residents of River Heights do not want any damage, even minimal, to Winnipeg’s elm trees.

Increased Commercial Space

  • Residents do not want commercial tenants with no clear indication of how they will serve the community.
  • Residents do not want more vacant commercial space.


Commercial Development of Corydon

  • Commercial nodes already exist along this stretch of Corydon.
  • The developer’s intent is to “increase the commercial vitality of this stretch Corydon”. This is in opposition to the desire of the residents to keep this stretch of Corydon free of the busy activity seen in other stretches of Corydon, and does not align with the City’s current approved zoning bylaws and local area plans.

Unwelcome Sights from Residents’ Homes

  • Residents of River Heights do not want to look at this from their front street or their living room windows, and do not want the accompanying decrease in property values.

The individuals who have signed this petition are either current or past residents of River Heights or concerned citizens. All request that 492 Queenston remains a “Residential 1” property. All request that the use of 1465 Corydon Avenue remains “restricted to the sole purpose of a general insurance and automobile insurance agency”.

Updates

Reached 100 supporters

April 27, 2021

59 Comments

G
Grant Patterson
5 years ago Featured

With the changes in office use, and the vacancy rate as a result of COVID there is no solid rationale for more retail space in a residential neighbourhood.

J
Jo Ann Smitten
5 years ago Featured

I believe that the proposed commercial building is too close to the Brock Corydon Elementary School. Parking is already problematic on Queenston Street as parents park to drop off and pick up kids.

A
Atarrha Wallace
5 years ago Featured

Do NOT want to look out my window to see a parking lot, and with proposed access from MY residential street. Furthermore, there are many, many people walking dogs and a lot of young children walking to school (which is across the street on Corydon) and back. A definite riskier situation. Totally ridiculous!!

R
Rodney Sankar
5 years ago Featured

Commercial buildings in residential areas are not always a good combo. People living in this area enjoy the quiet residential family neighbourhood. The increased traffic and added cars parking on the residential streets make it unsafe for children and families to enjoy playing and walks.

B
Bob Tollefson
5 years ago Featured

This development should be limited to the existing footprint. Residential and commercial must live together - a vast increase in size destroys this trust to the detriment of the residents of the area. The city is only motivated by the additional revenue, not always the quality of the neighbourhood.

A
Amber Doyle
5 years ago Featured

Our house will be right next door. I don’t want to share a fence with a busy parking lot, and there will be very clear sight lines into one of our bedrooms.

B
Benjamin G Larsson
5 years ago

Out of Character Contrary to Current Restricted Use and Zoning Agreement Caveats Precedence for Changes to the Character of Commercial Nodes Encroachment and Lines of Sight Parking Lots Access from and Egress onto Queenston Street etc.

K
ken kristjanson
5 years ago

Oppose this - it will bring even more traffic into the area