Skip to main content

Collingwood Reverie Development

130 Comments

J
James Coultier
8 months ago

Bylaws, guidelines, and restrictions exist to ensure and safeguard the best interests of the environment and all stakeholders. Desire for increased profit and decreased accountability is not in anybody’s best interest.

S
Scott Percival
8 months ago

The density and parking limits should not be amended!

A
Anonymous
8 months ago

As the numbers indicate, this is an outrageous proposal which should be turned down immediately. Please stop letting developers control the future of Collingwood.

N
Nathan Majury
8 months ago Featured

Council should be considering the quality of the developments proposed, rather than constantly adjusting zoning to permit the highest number of units possible. The only winner with this level of density is the developer - everyone else loses.

I
Ian Therriault
8 months ago

Please reject this builder’s request to increase density

K
Keith Reilly
8 months ago

I am against the proposal for increased density. It is not consistent with the existing neighbourhood. It will cause car congestion and also increase risk for LHP cyclists.

B
Barbara Cooper
8 months ago

The population density and traffic volume in this area has reached extreme amounts already, the road system is incapable of keeping up with the demand, as are the services in town. This byelaw exception should not be allowed.

S
Steve Gyetvai
8 months ago

Stay within established density. Area is already a traffic choke point.

J
Jennifer Forman
8 months ago

Development along 26 should not allow for extra density. We only have one chance to develop without losing the quality of the area.

F
Frieda Timofte
8 months ago

The request for increased density to the site is to high - the development has not provided space for a play ground or any other amenities for the residents.