Preserve the Diginity of the Divinity School Campus
206 Comments
I
Ignacio Franco
7 years ago
In my opinion, this is a shortsighted project that will make the good city of Rochester a less desirable place to live and visit. Why develop in such a way this Rochester jewel? Please find an appropriate project that takes advantages and enhances the majestic nature of this unique building and space in the city.
S
St Luke Hardy ssj
7 years ago
NO - Please deny this planned development until the design is appropriate
B
Barbara Case
7 years ago
The city has great plans for 2034. The Colgate area is designated "Flexible Mixed-Use." Hence, the developer's plan for 100 apartments, maybe a hotel, businesses, etc., etc. fits right in. So much for the plan's other objective: "Celebrate ASSETS
We will capitalize on our existing
unique assets, including natural and
scenic amenities, cultural heritage,
and distinctive historic structures
and landscapes, recognizing that
these assets enhance neighborhood
pride, foster a strong cultural
identity, and attract visitors, new
residents, and investment." One goal is being pursued at the expense of another. In the meantime, the lives of all those who live in the area will be severely impacted. Even now it's hard to cross Goodman; imagine what it would be like with 104 (plus) new residents and daytime visitors for business or whatever.
B
Benjamin Douglas Doane
7 years ago
This building is unique and should be celebrated as a defining feature of the neighbourhood rather than homogenised
L
Lisa Gwinner
7 years ago
I grew up in this neighborhood in the 70's & moved back here in the 90's. It's a beautiful place & this project would ruin the character & beauty. Please don't let it go through!!
D
Deborah Oakley
7 years ago
I’m familiar with the neighborhood as my daughter lived in the former dorms/ now apartments just over the hill. We need to maintain the character of the neighborhood.
C
Charles Courtsal
7 years ago
The development plan does not work at this site. Smaller apartment buildings needed. Keep away from the steep slopes and fever parking spaces are important.
L
Lisa Pelletier
7 years ago
Please vote no. This is not smart development. The Colgate Divinity school is a beautiful site and it’s historic integrity should be preserved.
E
Eileen Coughlin
7 years ago
I live a few blocks from the divinity school grounds and appreciate the continuation of green space as the city transitions from highland park to residential area on highland. I wish the city would spend funds (tax breaks being given) to tear down zombie houses instead of building more developments in an area rife with them already. In our small city I value our green spaces highly, and wish they would stop decreasing. I am a city voter and feel strongly about this issue.
R
Rachel ciopppa
7 years ago
Noooo
B
Beth Webster
7 years ago
Noooo
E
Ellen Bernitt
7 years ago
No!
L
Luke
7 years ago
Rochester needs to stop building huge apartment complexes that take valuable space away from the communities
B
Bill Skillern
7 years ago
I am very concerned by the glut of new SE City high rent apartments coming online while affordable housing stock is being locked up by speculators, the destruction of the historic Olmstead influenced grounds, the traffic overload on Goodman, the downing of 100+ trees on the moraine to build the only non-agricultural for profit development on the 3+ mile ridge in the form of a high density monstrosity overlooking the whole city accessed through an overloaded neighborhood street not close to downtown or near high frequency bus lines or planned future light rail lines.
D
Denise Doyle
7 years ago
Please preserve the beauty, dignity and character of the buildings and grounds of this iconic Rochester site.
R
Roslyn Goldman
7 years ago
We have to preserve our city
B
Barbara Yannie
7 years ago
This is an extra-ordinary landmark for Rochester. In future years , citizens & visitors to Rochester , will say ,"how did this development happen to such iconic property. ? " This exceptional property commands thoughtful design if used for residential development . Wouldn't ownership on smaller town-house homes be more suitable than renter agreements ?
Also , environmental , traffic , & egress issues are left unanswered.
City Council must consider the impact of this proposed development , seriously . It will affect all future development at such an historic & irreplaceable landmark site.
Please delay a decision. Why the rush ?
B
Barbara Blaakman
7 years ago
This is a massive development idea. We do not need any more apartments in this area. We are already congested with traffic and parking issues. We also need to preserve the aesthetic beauty of the neighborhood, which would be in jeopardy if there was an over development of apartments, hotel and banquets causing added traffic, noise and over crowding in an area already dealing with these issues. In a time of global warming and climate change, we need to preserve as many trees and plants as possible rather than rip them up in the name of progress.
J
Joe Rosenstiel
7 years ago
The best use of this property considering its location, unique topography and historic buildings is as an eastward extension of Highland Park.
K
Kathleen Gill
7 years ago
Respecting the Earth and the history of this property demands preservation of the land and architecture.
In my opinion, this is a shortsighted project that will make the good city of Rochester a less desirable place to live and visit. Why develop in such a way this Rochester jewel? Please find an appropriate project that takes advantages and enhances the majestic nature of this unique building and space in the city.
NO - Please deny this planned development until the design is appropriate
The city has great plans for 2034. The Colgate area is designated "Flexible Mixed-Use." Hence, the developer's plan for 100 apartments, maybe a hotel, businesses, etc., etc. fits right in. So much for the plan's other objective: "Celebrate ASSETS We will capitalize on our existing unique assets, including natural and scenic amenities, cultural heritage, and distinctive historic structures and landscapes, recognizing that these assets enhance neighborhood pride, foster a strong cultural identity, and attract visitors, new residents, and investment." One goal is being pursued at the expense of another. In the meantime, the lives of all those who live in the area will be severely impacted. Even now it's hard to cross Goodman; imagine what it would be like with 104 (plus) new residents and daytime visitors for business or whatever.
This building is unique and should be celebrated as a defining feature of the neighbourhood rather than homogenised
I grew up in this neighborhood in the 70's & moved back here in the 90's. It's a beautiful place & this project would ruin the character & beauty. Please don't let it go through!!
I’m familiar with the neighborhood as my daughter lived in the former dorms/ now apartments just over the hill. We need to maintain the character of the neighborhood.
The development plan does not work at this site. Smaller apartment buildings needed. Keep away from the steep slopes and fever parking spaces are important.
Please vote no. This is not smart development. The Colgate Divinity school is a beautiful site and it’s historic integrity should be preserved.
I live a few blocks from the divinity school grounds and appreciate the continuation of green space as the city transitions from highland park to residential area on highland. I wish the city would spend funds (tax breaks being given) to tear down zombie houses instead of building more developments in an area rife with them already. In our small city I value our green spaces highly, and wish they would stop decreasing. I am a city voter and feel strongly about this issue.
Noooo
Noooo
No!
Rochester needs to stop building huge apartment complexes that take valuable space away from the communities
I am very concerned by the glut of new SE City high rent apartments coming online while affordable housing stock is being locked up by speculators, the destruction of the historic Olmstead influenced grounds, the traffic overload on Goodman, the downing of 100+ trees on the moraine to build the only non-agricultural for profit development on the 3+ mile ridge in the form of a high density monstrosity overlooking the whole city accessed through an overloaded neighborhood street not close to downtown or near high frequency bus lines or planned future light rail lines.
Please preserve the beauty, dignity and character of the buildings and grounds of this iconic Rochester site.
We have to preserve our city
This is an extra-ordinary landmark for Rochester. In future years , citizens & visitors to Rochester , will say ,"how did this development happen to such iconic property. ? " This exceptional property commands thoughtful design if used for residential development . Wouldn't ownership on smaller town-house homes be more suitable than renter agreements ? Also , environmental , traffic , & egress issues are left unanswered. City Council must consider the impact of this proposed development , seriously . It will affect all future development at such an historic & irreplaceable landmark site. Please delay a decision. Why the rush ?
This is a massive development idea. We do not need any more apartments in this area. We are already congested with traffic and parking issues. We also need to preserve the aesthetic beauty of the neighborhood, which would be in jeopardy if there was an over development of apartments, hotel and banquets causing added traffic, noise and over crowding in an area already dealing with these issues. In a time of global warming and climate change, we need to preserve as many trees and plants as possible rather than rip them up in the name of progress.
The best use of this property considering its location, unique topography and historic buildings is as an eastward extension of Highland Park.
Respecting the Earth and the history of this property demands preservation of the land and architecture.