Citizens of Isle of Wight against Mallory Scott Farm rezoning
1,091 Comments
R
Robert John Livingston
5 years ago
23430
S
SHARON Livingston
5 years ago
Please don't kill Smithfield!
K
Kim center
5 years ago
23314
S
Stephen Haley
5 years ago
Density of housing is too high. 4 per acre in a Town setting.
S
Steven Porter
5 years ago
23430
A
Ashley Eells
5 years ago
Zip: 23430
J
John Porter
5 years ago
23430
P
Paul porter
5 years ago
23430
R
Robert Wilson
5 years ago
Do not destroy the small town atmosphere of Smithfield!!
Z
Zach
5 years ago
23430, we want to live in a town not a city
C
Chris O'Donnell
5 years ago
We do not want yet more high density housing in the area; it is inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood.
A
Ann Phinney
5 years ago
23430
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
23430!!! Don’t destroy our quiet town! Our schools can’t handle it! Our town will be destroyed and traffic will be a nightmare!
N
Nancy McPherson
5 years ago
23430
B
bill marriott
5 years ago
NO REZONING AT MALLORY SCOTT
P
Patrick Dulin
5 years ago
Moved here for peace and quiet, not traffic and development!
C
CHRISTOPHER P POWELL
5 years ago
23430
B
Barbara Russo
5 years ago
My zip code is 23314
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
The road at this site can’t even manage the homes which already exist. Just because developments were previously approved doesn’t mean they are still a wise choice in light of the present.
23430
Please don't kill Smithfield!
23314
Density of housing is too high. 4 per acre in a Town setting.
23430
Zip: 23430
23430
23430
Do not destroy the small town atmosphere of Smithfield!!
23430, we want to live in a town not a city
We do not want yet more high density housing in the area; it is inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood.
23430
23430!!! Don’t destroy our quiet town! Our schools can’t handle it! Our town will be destroyed and traffic will be a nightmare!
23430
NO REZONING AT MALLORY SCOTT
Moved here for peace and quiet, not traffic and development!
23430
My zip code is 23314
The road at this site can’t even manage the homes which already exist. Just because developments were previously approved doesn’t mean they are still a wise choice in light of the present.
Simple don’t need it.