Skip to main content

Citizens For Cathcart Safety

145 Comments

A
Anonymous
3 months ago

The Lorax would be proud of you. Save the trees!!!!

S
Susan M White
3 months ago

Snohomish County should have never approved this!

A
Anonymous
3 months ago

Please keep planning about the community and not the builders pocket books!

A
Anonymous
3 months ago

Children's safety should be the priority

J
Jan Corbally
3 months ago

Protect our school aged children and parents!

J
John Patterson
3 months ago

Political graft

A
Anonymous
3 months ago

This project is going to negatively impact traffic congestion and add more potential for accidents with the shear volume of cars not to mention risk of pedestrian accidents for all the children trying to get to school. Thia project should have been voted down in Snohomish county court. There is no real good solution. It will impact the community regardless, however round abouts in Lake Stevens and South Snohomish prove to be a huge challange for washington drivers. NO to the round about, YES to alternative enterances to the complexes directly off onf HWY9 and the utility service road enterance.

M
Michael Dahlstrom
3 months ago

Hold the County Planning people and Developers accountable. Get the peoples voice heard FIRST.

B
Bruce Turner
3 months ago Featured

Please do not use Greenleaf’s narrow neighborhood street as a high-use thoroughfare! Don’t wait until someone runs over a child on our currently dead end, quiet street to do the right thing!

M
Mallory Principe
3 months ago

Our main concern is the through traffic by the schools. Thoughtless and ridiculous.

N
Nannette Roenfeldt
3 months ago

There was very little impact consideration by Snohomish County when approving the new Cathcart community. As is, the impact would be dramatic and devastating in some areas. Please reconsider and look deeply into making changes to reduce the affect on our wonderful, peaceful community.

L
Lisa Kotrba
3 months ago

Greenleaf cannot handle hundreds if not housands of additional cars driving through on a daily basis. Lowell Larimer is a poorly maintained country road that is grossly overused due to growth in the area. The corner of Marsh/Seattle Hill Road/Lowell Larimer should have a roandabout or lights; it can take 10+ minutes waiting in traffic there.

B
Bianca Kamnitzer
3 months ago

Some roundabouts are a good idea, but not this one. It’s absolutely inane that the county allows for developments this huge when we have such an issue with overcrowding of schools and traffic. Our roads are a mess. Don’t allow cutting through GreenLeaf. Lowell Larimer is not safe for more traffic. Also address the need for bike lanes and public transportation. We desperately need a roundabout at the intersection of Marsh Road and Lowell Larimer. I can’t even leave my streets during the afternoon rush.

J
Joe Campana
4 months ago

Growth should not come at the expense of safety and proper infrastructure.

M
Melissa Campana
4 months ago

No infrastructure or proper roads for all this development. The traffic is already horrendous. Kids biking, walking, evoking and playing along a highway and high speed area is dangerous.

C
Clare Walderman
4 months ago

It is imperative that Snohomish County planners assess impacts to community safety equal to housing needs / development. Egress out of a large development is key to overall safety. Pedestrian and school safety cannot be ignored by developers.

C
Crystal Goodsell Harwood
4 months ago

No road & pedestrian access only

K
Kathy Derks
4 months ago

As a Snohomish SD bus driver who drives for GPHS and Little Cedars, this is a horrible idea. Our busses already have a challenge navigating through all the parent traffic getting in our way. We need to get these kids to school ontime and safely. This will not happen if these road proposals go through. Speak to our Transportation Director to gain some insight on what our dept has to deal with.

B
Barry J Trosin
4 months ago

In addition to the traffic safety issues am concerned about the lack of additional schools and what sort of burden this will have on our district

J
Jim kim
4 months ago

NO