Skip to main content

Citizens Against The Bridge

152 Comments

M
michael hall
9 years ago

The great problem is that public officials do not generally understand the concept of public good. What's good just for 11 homeowners in Chilmark is not automatically good for Chilmark.

S
Sara Kaufman
9 years ago

Please don't build it

A
Ann Boyer
9 years ago

If part of the reason to donate this land to VOLF was to save taxes, won't those taxes now be due if the land is sold, producing income? And how do we compensate the wildlife whose ecosystem is now to be trashed? And what about explaining to all the taxpayers — not just the Eleven — and to our grandchildren this travesty of wasteful ugly instruction?

A
Ann Boyer
9 years ago

As a longtime Chilmark resident/taxpayer, I am just sick — not only to see this proposal, but to contemplate the way it has been pushed. This bridge benefits no one. It destroys a treasured area.

R
Rachel Baird
9 years ago

Come on - this beach is for everyone, not just the 11 homeowners, your JOB, first and foremost is to preserve this beautiful natural area. Any bridge should be as harmonious with the environment and leaving the view and beach undisturbed - you know this! The monstrosity bridge is not the answer - back to the drawing board - please don't ruin one of the island's most beautiful beaches.

A
Arthur Eakin
9 years ago

This is insane ! Next they'll build a bridge to Woods Hole !

T
Tom Avery
9 years ago

As a longtime tax paying home owner I strenuously object to this project. It is not in keeping with Marthas Vineyard values.

C
Carol Franck
9 years ago

This is a disgrace and desecration! Stop it!

E
Edward Wilson
9 years ago

This is a very bad thing. Nit to mention underhanded and illegal.

K
Kathryn Guerin
9 years ago

I am totally against this horrible and illegal project.

M
Mary Curtis Gude
9 years ago

This sounds horrible, no bridge on the Beach!!!!

R
Richard Peter Guerin
9 years ago

As an Architect I think this is an absolute disregard for the beauty of the area, its environment, and the Town of Chilmark residents.

J
Jessie Benton
9 years ago

Absolutely outrageous!

A
Adrianne Ryan
9 years ago

Squibnocket beach is a sacred place which should be maintained as the treasure it is, not maimed for the "convenience" of a few.

R
Robert Gossett
9 years ago

United States

R
Roberta Lee Scott
9 years ago Featured

Convenience vs. conservation? The fact that they both begin with the same three letters is the only thing they have in common. I go for conservation, saving the beach which cannot be replaced, and using a low impact approach (which I hear is also less expensive!)

E
Ed Cerullo
9 years ago

While sympathetic to the homeowners ' concern for access to their properties, the current plan is rather insensitive And destructive to the current environment and local esthetic, particularly in light of the existence of more sensitive, less jarring – and less expensive- access design proposals. I would hope the Selectmen appreciate the community opposition and will reconsider the current plan

A
Ali Marsh Weller
9 years ago

Squibnocket Beach and the surrounding areas are very special to my family. We have been renters in Chilmark for many summers. The area is unique in it's pristine beauty - please do not build this bridge! It is not worth it to mar the gorgeous landscape for the "convenience" of a few families.

A
Amy Kaufman
9 years ago

Please don't build a bridge. That is such a beautiful area and should be left undeveloped. Thank you, Amy Kaufman

E
Eden Wurmfeld
9 years ago

the reason we travel to MV is because it's less built up and therefore more beautiful than so many beach destinations that have been destroyed by development.