Skip to main content

Crisis in the CAUS

225 Comments

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

b.arch 1994 ms arch 1997

J
Jordan M Mrazik
5 years ago

AIA B.Arch 2011

J
Jarri Hasnain
5 years ago

B.Arch 2011

T
Tray Strawhorn RA
5 years ago

B.Arch 2012

J
Jeremy Ficca RA
5 years ago

BArch 1996

R
Robert J Buckanavage AIA
5 years ago

CAUS - Class of 1995

L
Laura Escobar
5 years ago

B.Arch 2015 M.Arch 2016

K
Kelly McCarthy
5 years ago

B. Arch 2016

M
Michelle Mitchell
5 years ago Featured

While not mentioned in the petition, I as a Landscape Architecture student at the WAAC have witnessed the changes and hard line of the Dean first hand. I've been asked not to include VT administration and student support staff in e-mails. Veiled threats have been made when I defied those orders. It's an issue for all of us affiliated with the VT.

J
Jeffrey Curtis
5 years ago

MLA 2017

G
Gabe Oliver
5 years ago

M.Arch 2011

A
Andrew Ferrarelli
5 years ago

B.Arch, 2007

E
Elisabeth Kim Oliver
5 years ago

M.Arch 2012

D
David Mann
5 years ago

BArch 1987

J
Joshua S R Batman Assoc AIA
5 years ago

I have witnessed first hand the wanton destruction Dean Blythe has caused during his tenure. Remove him before one of our greatest assets in Architectural education is gone forever.

X
Xin Fu
5 years ago

B.Arch 2013

K
Kevin R Mitchell JD AIA NCARB PMP DBIA LEED AP BDC
5 years ago

Certain things should not change: • Civil discourse • A healthy working environment • A working environment that isn’t hostile • Communicating respectfully with all parties • Being able to professionally express oneself without fear of unprofessional reprisals • Transparency in administrative decision making • The right to reasonably question authority • The right to hold authority accountable to the ‘governed’ If any party declares that they are ‘change’ and that all others must either ‘embrace’ or ‘be left behind’, where is the opportunity to question, understand, vet, validate, discover, and conclude that the party is indeed ‘change’ for the better rather than merely ‘change’ for the sake of ‘change’ or a detrimental ‘change’ that doesn’t serve to mold a positive ‘Beyond Boundaries’ future?

L
Lawrence Mason
5 years ago

BARCH 1993

J
Jana Gottlieb Hartenstine AIA
5 years ago

BArch 1995

K
Kevin R Mitchell JD AIA NCARB PMP DBIA LEED AP BDC
5 years ago

There are always those that presume to prosper under any leadership...which should not be construed as a testament of the quality of the 'leadership'. The nature of existence is change, I've heard no suggestion to the contrary from the aggrieved. It is a matter of methodology.