This kind of issues should be decided by entire members.
J
John Kwang Kim
2 years ago
We should bring this kind of issues to members to vote.
B
Benjamin Chen
2 years ago
We should keep the same policy for prime members only on weekends before 10 a.m.
H
Hong Lu
2 years ago
I am against to let spouse to play before 10am during the weekend
P
Peter Stokes
2 years ago
It needs to be clear what decisions the board can make on behalf of the members and those decisions that require a vote by members who qualify to vote.
B
Bruce Gomes
2 years ago
Featured
Does this change affect the membership in general. There will no longer be a Primary member and there is no discussion how starting times would be handled going forward. We had this battle years ago when the opposite course is jammed with people trying to use.
J
JINHYUK CHOI
2 years ago
I am for the policy change but I also agree that this should be on full membership vote
R
Ronnie si
2 years ago
Agreed
K
Keith Nofield
2 years ago
As mentioned by others, this should go to the entire membership, not just a selected few.
J
Jed J Jelincic
2 years ago
This is not a change that should have been handled without input from members. Whether you agree or not with the policy it should have been brought to members for a vote.
S
Seifu Togo
2 years ago
An issue of this nature, should be decided/voted on by the primary members.
A
Art Gardner
2 years ago
yes, a special meeting should be held.
W
Whitney Tomlin
2 years ago
Should go to a member vote!!!
J
Jay Clifton
2 years ago
Agree this idea should be heard by Membership prior to change. Questions might be: Why and where did the idea generate?
R
Ralph Adams
2 years ago
I believe this needs a more thorough review, not a unilateral decision.
B
Benjamin Harrison
2 years ago
Featured
Im sure the new policy has best intentions in mind, and I'm neutral on the policy itself as I don't know all the details.
I do however agree that larger issues like this should be voted on by members with voting rights. Thanks. -Benjamin
P
Ping Luo
2 years ago
My club number: 681
D
Debra Hunt
2 years ago
Featured
As stated the Spouse etal can play at anytime on opposite course without a primary member. I disagree, as a primary member that doesn’t play in the Saturday scramble it opens up the problem of over crowding the opposite course in early hours and not allowing me the full benefit of my primary membership.
M
Mark Medor
2 years ago
Featured
This change would devalue the experience of the primary members as key reasons to be a member at Castlewood is easy access and quick rounds of golf on the weekends. A change of this nature should be decided by a vote of the primary members.
W
Wendell Blonigan
2 years ago
Featured
In general terms, I am against action taken to diminish or dilute the status and privileges of Regular Primary Members. That being said, I trust that the board made this decision with insight into the need of a membership vote, which apparently is not required. I also assume that this is being driven by a small but vocal minority of the regular membership. A discussion appears to be warranted prior to implementation. It would seem that the course opposite the shotgun would become more crowded, as well as Sunday mornings prior to tee times. Keeping the current rules should provide more open access to regular primary members who are working, and Saturday and Sunday are their open golfing days.
This kind of issues should be decided by entire members.
We should bring this kind of issues to members to vote.
We should keep the same policy for prime members only on weekends before 10 a.m.
I am against to let spouse to play before 10am during the weekend
It needs to be clear what decisions the board can make on behalf of the members and those decisions that require a vote by members who qualify to vote.
Does this change affect the membership in general. There will no longer be a Primary member and there is no discussion how starting times would be handled going forward. We had this battle years ago when the opposite course is jammed with people trying to use.
I am for the policy change but I also agree that this should be on full membership vote
Agreed
As mentioned by others, this should go to the entire membership, not just a selected few.
This is not a change that should have been handled without input from members. Whether you agree or not with the policy it should have been brought to members for a vote.
An issue of this nature, should be decided/voted on by the primary members.
yes, a special meeting should be held.
Should go to a member vote!!!
Agree this idea should be heard by Membership prior to change. Questions might be: Why and where did the idea generate?
I believe this needs a more thorough review, not a unilateral decision.
Im sure the new policy has best intentions in mind, and I'm neutral on the policy itself as I don't know all the details. I do however agree that larger issues like this should be voted on by members with voting rights. Thanks. -Benjamin
My club number: 681
As stated the Spouse etal can play at anytime on opposite course without a primary member. I disagree, as a primary member that doesn’t play in the Saturday scramble it opens up the problem of over crowding the opposite course in early hours and not allowing me the full benefit of my primary membership.
This change would devalue the experience of the primary members as key reasons to be a member at Castlewood is easy access and quick rounds of golf on the weekends. A change of this nature should be decided by a vote of the primary members.
In general terms, I am against action taken to diminish or dilute the status and privileges of Regular Primary Members. That being said, I trust that the board made this decision with insight into the need of a membership vote, which apparently is not required. I also assume that this is being driven by a small but vocal minority of the regular membership. A discussion appears to be warranted prior to implementation. It would seem that the course opposite the shotgun would become more crowded, as well as Sunday mornings prior to tee times. Keeping the current rules should provide more open access to regular primary members who are working, and Saturday and Sunday are their open golfing days.