A plea for caution before changing bacterial names in databases
128 Comments
I
Iva Slováková
5 months ago
I completely agree. We need to support our clinicians in diagnostics and therapy and not to confuse them.
J
Jakub Hurych
5 months ago
Indeed, too many taxonomical name changes are causing confusion.
A
Alena Volfová
5 months ago
Doporučuji zachovat šetrně nomenklaturu hlavně patogenních bakterií.
E
Eva Vítová
5 months ago
I completely agree.
K
Kateřina Matějová
5 months ago
I completely agree. We need to support our clinicians in diagnostics and therapy and not to confuse them.
Z
Zuzana Zemanová
5 months ago
I agree.
P
Petra Lavríková
5 months ago
From the point of view of communicating the results vie informatics system, frequent changes in the nomenclature bring many problem on many levels and it's definitely important to think twice about each change.
T
Tamara Bergerová
5 months ago
I completely agree. We need to support our clinicians in diagnostics and therapy and not to confuse them.
B
Blanka Sýkorová
5 months ago
I agree. The laboratory is forced to comment on its findings because clinicians don't understand them
V
Václav Vaniš
5 months ago
I completely agree. This is a very useful initiative; my thanks to the authors!
M
Michael Elgas
6 months ago
Please stop this nonsense of renaming and rebranding pathogens. A change of pathogen names causes more confusion, trouble and mischief than necessary. In the worst case it may lead to delayed, inappropriate or even omitted therapy. In milder cases it just contributes to the chaos facter in scientific nomenclature.
M
Michael Rodgers MD
6 months ago
Very important!
M
Manfred Zinn
6 months ago
Newcomers in scientific fields frequently miss old literature because of name changes of the strains.
E
Emek Türkekul
6 months ago
“Frequent nomenclature changes risk misinterpretation and inappropriate treatment.”
M
Michel Monod
6 months ago
I agree. This makes a lot of problems. The same is true for fungi and plants
A
Anonymous
6 months ago
Featured
I do not believe that changing the nomenclature of prokaryotes constitutes a novel scientific contribution; on the contrary, it may also erase the legacy of the individual who originally assigned the name. Therefore, such name changes should be avoided.
M
Matthias Maiwald
6 months ago
I fully support this petition, but I emphasize that this must be coordinated with the ICSP.
D
Daniel Peter
6 months ago
Fully agree.
F
Fricker-Feer Claudia
6 months ago
I completely agree with this petition.
A
Anonymous
6 months ago
I fully support this initiative. Frequent changes in nomenclature are confusing for clinicians and in the worst case can result in wrong interpretation of microbiological data and inadequate patient treatment.
I completely agree. We need to support our clinicians in diagnostics and therapy and not to confuse them.
Indeed, too many taxonomical name changes are causing confusion.
Doporučuji zachovat šetrně nomenklaturu hlavně patogenních bakterií.
I completely agree.
I completely agree. We need to support our clinicians in diagnostics and therapy and not to confuse them.
I agree.
From the point of view of communicating the results vie informatics system, frequent changes in the nomenclature bring many problem on many levels and it's definitely important to think twice about each change.
I completely agree. We need to support our clinicians in diagnostics and therapy and not to confuse them.
I agree. The laboratory is forced to comment on its findings because clinicians don't understand them
I completely agree. This is a very useful initiative; my thanks to the authors!
Please stop this nonsense of renaming and rebranding pathogens. A change of pathogen names causes more confusion, trouble and mischief than necessary. In the worst case it may lead to delayed, inappropriate or even omitted therapy. In milder cases it just contributes to the chaos facter in scientific nomenclature.
Very important!
Newcomers in scientific fields frequently miss old literature because of name changes of the strains.
“Frequent nomenclature changes risk misinterpretation and inappropriate treatment.”
I agree. This makes a lot of problems. The same is true for fungi and plants
I do not believe that changing the nomenclature of prokaryotes constitutes a novel scientific contribution; on the contrary, it may also erase the legacy of the individual who originally assigned the name. Therefore, such name changes should be avoided.
I fully support this petition, but I emphasize that this must be coordinated with the ICSP.
Fully agree.
I completely agree with this petition.
I fully support this initiative. Frequent changes in nomenclature are confusing for clinicians and in the worst case can result in wrong interpretation of microbiological data and inadequate patient treatment.