CALL To Suspend Vaccination For Those Under 30 (esp. 12 to 15 year-olds)
972 Comments
S
Sunnie
5 years ago
Mother of 2 teens
D
David Leong
5 years ago
Use Sinovac/ Sinopharm instead where no adverse effects has arisen after 1 billion shots in China. China has allowed vaccination for children above 12yrs and no allergy cases reported so far.
P
Pradeep
5 years ago
Do not harm
M
Meily Wantah
5 years ago
We trust the expert committee has the best interest of every Singaporean and resident at heart and is acting prudently and swiftly to handle this disease.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Please test whether this vaccine will eventually cause long term side effects for young children and their growth..
E
Esther Teo
5 years ago
Please give parents the choice of whether to vaccinate their children. Look at the evidence that comes from Israel. They have tested on 70% of their nation, look hard at their data before any rash decision. Our youth are our future. We still need them to do National Service to defend our country.
A
AY
5 years ago
The 20s and 30s are yet to proceed nor complete the vaccination, why gov so in a hurry to push the younger generations to jab?
Has all the above 60s, 50s, 40s completed the vaccination?
SG gov always mentioned that our young ones are the MASTER of the Future, right ?
I hope SG gov can consider to do it a step by a step.
Y
Yukiko Kobayashi
5 years ago
This vaccines are still experimental. Long term safety hasn’t confirmed yet. We don’t want to risk our children to save older generations even though there is no risk of death with young population from Covid-19. If something happens later with children, we have no futures.
F
FK
5 years ago
Government being selfish of its economy than those lives of their people.
P
Patrick Goh
5 years ago
None of the vaccines has completed safety trials yet they are approved for use under EUA. UK and Germany have halted their vaccination drive for their youth. Kids are at low risk to Covid to begin with. We have not even considered the long term harm vaccines can cause. Stop this madness!
S
Saravanan
5 years ago
I am really concerned about this as my child is due for vaccination. Thank you.
C
Cinnamon
5 years ago
The risks outweigh the benefits for the younger population.
The elderly are more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection, but the younger population, who many have yet to serve NS or start families and work life have more risks stacked against them from the vaccines. Myocarditis is only just one possiblity. No one knows the long term consequences or vascular conditions that may surface in the future of this young ones.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-06/03-COVID-Shimabukuro-508.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3TwBYVdN1fCMazCnys6LPvSho97ezT_MraY-GsZZn-VhftMtVFPVZP6vE
N
Nicholas Lim
5 years ago
We should always err on the side of caution especially when health and lives are at stake.
What's this "expert" committee that decides on our behalf? Do we have the names of these people on the board? Will they be held liable if anything untoward happen? Otherwise, how can they decide the fate of our young? We decide our leaders by electing them. This "expert" committee isn't.
M
Michele Wong
5 years ago
Please suspend and investigate further
J
JW
5 years ago
My sincere request for a “non mandatory vaccination” as much long term safety data still needed.
Appealing for all especially the medical community (pro/anti vaccine) to constructively discuss whether dangers exist - it is our basic duty as “guardians”.
Agree to a “more sensible and prudent posture” to wait.
Hope will reconsider.
K
Kay Swee Pin
5 years ago
Very unhappy when my daughter in the US forced my 13 year old grandson to be vaccinated . The risk outweighs the very limited benefits to the young men . After all, the therapeutics available have been proven very effective should the very unlikely event of being infected happens .
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Please stop and monitor first. I am truly concern with the vaccination for the younger ones as there are not many proven medical sources on health safety on the long run.
Mother of 2 teens
Use Sinovac/ Sinopharm instead where no adverse effects has arisen after 1 billion shots in China. China has allowed vaccination for children above 12yrs and no allergy cases reported so far.
Do not harm
We trust the expert committee has the best interest of every Singaporean and resident at heart and is acting prudently and swiftly to handle this disease.
Please test whether this vaccine will eventually cause long term side effects for young children and their growth..
Please give parents the choice of whether to vaccinate their children. Look at the evidence that comes from Israel. They have tested on 70% of their nation, look hard at their data before any rash decision. Our youth are our future. We still need them to do National Service to defend our country.
The 20s and 30s are yet to proceed nor complete the vaccination, why gov so in a hurry to push the younger generations to jab? Has all the above 60s, 50s, 40s completed the vaccination? SG gov always mentioned that our young ones are the MASTER of the Future, right ? I hope SG gov can consider to do it a step by a step.
This vaccines are still experimental. Long term safety hasn’t confirmed yet. We don’t want to risk our children to save older generations even though there is no risk of death with young population from Covid-19. If something happens later with children, we have no futures.
Government being selfish of its economy than those lives of their people.
None of the vaccines has completed safety trials yet they are approved for use under EUA. UK and Germany have halted their vaccination drive for their youth. Kids are at low risk to Covid to begin with. We have not even considered the long term harm vaccines can cause. Stop this madness!
I am really concerned about this as my child is due for vaccination. Thank you.
The risks outweigh the benefits for the younger population. The elderly are more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection, but the younger population, who many have yet to serve NS or start families and work life have more risks stacked against them from the vaccines. Myocarditis is only just one possiblity. No one knows the long term consequences or vascular conditions that may surface in the future of this young ones. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-06/03-COVID-Shimabukuro-508.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3TwBYVdN1fCMazCnys6LPvSho97ezT_MraY-GsZZn-VhftMtVFPVZP6vE
We should always err on the side of caution especially when health and lives are at stake. What's this "expert" committee that decides on our behalf? Do we have the names of these people on the board? Will they be held liable if anything untoward happen? Otherwise, how can they decide the fate of our young? We decide our leaders by electing them. This "expert" committee isn't.
Please suspend and investigate further
My sincere request for a “non mandatory vaccination” as much long term safety data still needed. Appealing for all especially the medical community (pro/anti vaccine) to constructively discuss whether dangers exist - it is our basic duty as “guardians”. Agree to a “more sensible and prudent posture” to wait. Hope will reconsider.
Very unhappy when my daughter in the US forced my 13 year old grandson to be vaccinated . The risk outweighs the very limited benefits to the young men . After all, the therapeutics available have been proven very effective should the very unlikely event of being infected happens .
Please stop and monitor first. I am truly concern with the vaccination for the younger ones as there are not many proven medical sources on health safety on the long run.
Please suspend until further investigation
I love Singapore.
Mercy for the teen and people