Skip to main content

Debating C.C. Little Past and Present at the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

130 Comments

N
Nadine Hubbs
8 years ago Featured

C. C. Little argued that university was not for everyone, and admittance should be screened. Surely the same standard applies to people memorialized by U-M bldgs. They should represent our best ideals, and this report suggests he fails the test.

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

PhD student, Sociology

D
Diane Jonas Locker
8 years ago

LSA 1979

K
Katie Kennedy
8 years ago

ABOUT TIME.

M
Marie Stango
8 years ago

PhD, 2016

S
Sloka Krishnan
8 years ago

MSI 2015

D
Daniel Hirschman
8 years ago

BS, 2002 PhD, 2016

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

This is not rewriting history. The Building should be renamed to reflect one or more of the many truly great scientists that walked the halls of the building, whether as students or professors. Prof C.C. Little and his scientific efforts will not be forgotten history - just more appropriately placed. NA, U-M Honors College, Geology B.S., 1978

N
Nicholas Fadanelli
8 years ago

LSA Student Government President

A
Angela Dillard
8 years ago

Happy to be involved in bringing this document to the U-M community and engaging students, faculty, staff and alums in this important debate about CC Little and history and the politics of naming/renaming buildings on campus.