Bill 139 will establish a new part of the Employment Standards Act that will apply special rules for the staffing services industry. If this bill is passed, it will eliminate the elect to work exemptions related to notice of termination and severance pay. When this regulation is passed, it will mean that elect to work employees will be entitled to notice of termination (or termination pay in lieu of notice) and severance pay under the ESA.
We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who urge our leaders to act now to
1. Recognize there is no "employment" when the employee is inactive (not on assignment).
2. Not impose a different and higher legislative standard on staffing firm employers in comparison to other industries in North America.
3. Recognize that the Act should not dictate or attempt to interfere with established contractual agreements between staffing firms and their clients.
We urge the Government of Canada to suspend further efforts on the proposed bill pending a review of the key areas above.
I am currently reviewing the feedback provided by stakeholders regarding the potential economic impact of Bill 139. Discussions with industry representatives remain ongoing as we analyze the long-term consequences of these proposed regulatory changes.
March 19, 2009
The rapid growth of support for this petition indicates that many people prioritize fair and consistent labor standards. Your commitment to reviewing the implications of Bill 139 provides the necessary focus to ensure our concerns are properly addressed.
6 Comments
M
Mike Sanders
17 years ago
Featured
This bill is going to hurt the staffing industry big time. My company already operates on tight margins as it is.
J
Jason Mendoza
17 years ago
Featured
keep the ESA consistent across all businesses. stop picking on staffing firms.
S
Sarah Guerrero
17 years ago
Featured
Stop messing with these contracts. People work in staffing because they want the flexibility. Dont ruin it for everyone.
K
Kevin Holmes
17 years ago
Featured
Lets slow down on this. If this passes my local agency will have to lay people off just to cover the costs.
L
Linda Perez
17 years ago
Featured
TOTAL NON SENSE. You cant expect a company to pay severance for someone who isnt even on an assignment. Think people!!
D
Dave Robinson
17 years ago
Featured
Ridiculous overreach. Government needs to stay out of private business agreements.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach
100 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
or sign with Email
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via
.
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Bill 139 will establish a new part of the Employment Standards Act that will apply special rules for the staffing services industry. If this bill is passed, it will eliminate the elect to work exemptions related to notice of termination and severance pay. When this regulation is passed, it will mean that elect to work employees will be entitled to notice of termination (or termination pay in lieu of notice) and severance pay under the ESA.
We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who urge our leaders to act now to
1. Recognize there is no "employment" when the employee is inactive (not on assignment).
2. Not impose a different and higher legislative standard on staffing firm employers in comparison to other industries in North America.
3. Recognize that the Act should not dictate or attempt to interfere with established contractual agreements between staffing firms and their clients.
We urge the Government of Canada to suspend further efforts on the proposed bill pending a review of the key areas above.
I am currently reviewing the feedback provided by stakeholders regarding the potential economic impact of Bill 139. Discussions with industry representatives remain ongoing as we analyze the long-term consequences of these proposed regulatory changes.
March 19, 2009
The rapid growth of support for this petition indicates that many people prioritize fair and consistent labor standards. Your commitment to reviewing the implications of Bill 139 provides the necessary focus to ensure our concerns are properly addressed.
6 Comments
M
Mike Sanders
17 years ago
Featured
This bill is going to hurt the staffing industry big time. My company already operates on tight margins as it is.
J
Jason Mendoza
17 years ago
Featured
keep the ESA consistent across all businesses. stop picking on staffing firms.
S
Sarah Guerrero
17 years ago
Featured
Stop messing with these contracts. People work in staffing because they want the flexibility. Dont ruin it for everyone.
K
Kevin Holmes
17 years ago
Featured
Lets slow down on this. If this passes my local agency will have to lay people off just to cover the costs.
L
Linda Perez
17 years ago
Featured
TOTAL NON SENSE. You cant expect a company to pay severance for someone who isnt even on an assignment. Think people!!
D
Dave Robinson
17 years ago
Featured
Ridiculous overreach. Government needs to stay out of private business agreements.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach
100 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
or sign with Email
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
This bill is going to hurt the staffing industry big time. My company already operates on tight margins as it is.