accessibility to voting is critical to qualify an election as fair
A
Aparajita
1 year ago
Absentee voting makes sense!
T
Trisha Raya Roy
1 year ago
On behalf of adults in my generation who were raised in the BCS community, many of whom have already signed this petition, I am demanding that we are given a fair right to vote in this election. As members of due paying families, we have a strong claim to representation in this election. The Nomination Committee has had ample time (over 3 weeks) to schedule a General Body meeting for members to vote on a constitutional amendment to create proper voting procedures. An election can not and must not be held without consensus on how an election will be executed. Without proper procedures, such as absentee voting and voter registration guidelines, we have no guarantee that this election will be fairly conducted or administered. Given the Nomination Committee's failure to schedule a General Body meeting to discuss such an amendment, it is only right that the Holiday Party meeting be used for this purpose. The election can be held (with an absentee voting option) shortly after constitutional amendments have been made. The current Executive and Nomination Committees cannot speed through this process and bypass the legal rights and organizational claims of due paying members.
U
Ushasi Jhiri Datta
1 year ago
Voter suppression is never okay. Let everyone’s voices be heard and give them the opportunity to choose who THE PEOPLE want to guide the BCS.
O
Ovi Ghosh
1 year ago
Doing this if in case in snows, then people will have provision to vote online also.
B
Bhaswati Bandyopadhyay
1 year ago
I wholeheartedly support the petition.
B
Bikram Roy
1 year ago
I support this petition because it highlights the importance of ensuring that all members can exercise their constitutional right to vote, as stated in ARTICLE VIII, Section 1: 'Each member of the Association shall have the right to vote and to contest for any position of the Executive Committee.'
That said, as debated many times earlier this year, any changes to the voting process must first be approved in person by the General Body, as required under ARTICLE VI, Section 1, to stay true to our Constitution.
I also want to take a moment to thank the Nomination Committee for their efforts. It’s important to remember that they only learned about the unexpected development of multiple slates on November 16, giving them very little time to navigate this challenging situation. I feel some of the comments here, and over the past few weeks, including on our public Facebook page—accusing them of concealing the second slate, voter suppression, or disenfranchisement—are both unfair and hurtful. The committee is working within the framework of the Constitution, and they deserve our gratitude, not blame, for stepping up to facilitate a fair election under these conditions.
I also find it ironic that earlier this year, many petitioners here were livid at the idea of EC ’24 even proposing an online public opinion poll, yet now are calling to jump straight into online elections. While I agree that absentee and online voting would make the process more inclusive, such changes must be implemented thoughtfully, transparently, and in line with constitutional processes to ensure fairness and trust.
If the General Body approves a motion to allow such voting methods, I’d recommend a secure platform like ElectionBuddy.com to make this process accessible and secure for everyone.
Let’s continue this conversation with respect, understanding, and consistency, and work together to strengthen BCS for the future.
D
Debashish Roy
1 year ago
Featured
This is a carefully designed voter disenfranchisement scheme that our family strongly protests. The basic right of every due-paying member of any organization is to have a say in the election of its office-bearers. If after being a member for three decades we are denied this basic right through a power grab, it may not make any sense to continue being a member.
P
Paritosh Chatterjee
1 year ago
Agree internet voting
S
Subha Sen Pakrashi
1 year ago
Both Dr.Brojesh Pakrashi and Dr subha Sen pakrashi are supporting the issue
Thank you
N
Neepa Subramanian
1 year ago
This sounds like a reasonable and fair option in any voting process. Thank you to all for proposing/facilitating this option!
A
Adrik Dutta
1 year ago
Don’t screw up my BCS
D
Debasish Mukhopadhyay
1 year ago
opportunities should be provided to new talents when they are volunteering to serve BCS community.
A
Anil Kumar Singh
1 year ago
It is good for the overall community in the long run .
S
Sujay Datta
1 year ago
Featured
I strongly feel that the committee in charge of conducting the election (in this case, the Nomination Committee) should have been proactive and taken meaningful steps to ensure that EVERYBODY is able to exercise their right to vote, accepting the options of absentee ballots and online voting. Isn’t it common sense that without those, it will be a clear and intentional case of voter suppression?
S
Swapan Das
1 year ago
All should be allowed to cast their vote as per the constitution of BCS
P
Prabar Ghosh
1 year ago
This is first time in the history of BCS members will elect EC. Every member should have the right to vote.
Please allow for online voting option
I support online voting for more convenience
I wholeheartedly support this initiative.
accessibility to voting is critical to qualify an election as fair
Absentee voting makes sense!
On behalf of adults in my generation who were raised in the BCS community, many of whom have already signed this petition, I am demanding that we are given a fair right to vote in this election. As members of due paying families, we have a strong claim to representation in this election. The Nomination Committee has had ample time (over 3 weeks) to schedule a General Body meeting for members to vote on a constitutional amendment to create proper voting procedures. An election can not and must not be held without consensus on how an election will be executed. Without proper procedures, such as absentee voting and voter registration guidelines, we have no guarantee that this election will be fairly conducted or administered. Given the Nomination Committee's failure to schedule a General Body meeting to discuss such an amendment, it is only right that the Holiday Party meeting be used for this purpose. The election can be held (with an absentee voting option) shortly after constitutional amendments have been made. The current Executive and Nomination Committees cannot speed through this process and bypass the legal rights and organizational claims of due paying members.
Voter suppression is never okay. Let everyone’s voices be heard and give them the opportunity to choose who THE PEOPLE want to guide the BCS.
Doing this if in case in snows, then people will have provision to vote online also.
I wholeheartedly support the petition.
I support this petition because it highlights the importance of ensuring that all members can exercise their constitutional right to vote, as stated in ARTICLE VIII, Section 1: 'Each member of the Association shall have the right to vote and to contest for any position of the Executive Committee.' That said, as debated many times earlier this year, any changes to the voting process must first be approved in person by the General Body, as required under ARTICLE VI, Section 1, to stay true to our Constitution. I also want to take a moment to thank the Nomination Committee for their efforts. It’s important to remember that they only learned about the unexpected development of multiple slates on November 16, giving them very little time to navigate this challenging situation. I feel some of the comments here, and over the past few weeks, including on our public Facebook page—accusing them of concealing the second slate, voter suppression, or disenfranchisement—are both unfair and hurtful. The committee is working within the framework of the Constitution, and they deserve our gratitude, not blame, for stepping up to facilitate a fair election under these conditions. I also find it ironic that earlier this year, many petitioners here were livid at the idea of EC ’24 even proposing an online public opinion poll, yet now are calling to jump straight into online elections. While I agree that absentee and online voting would make the process more inclusive, such changes must be implemented thoughtfully, transparently, and in line with constitutional processes to ensure fairness and trust. If the General Body approves a motion to allow such voting methods, I’d recommend a secure platform like ElectionBuddy.com to make this process accessible and secure for everyone. Let’s continue this conversation with respect, understanding, and consistency, and work together to strengthen BCS for the future.
This is a carefully designed voter disenfranchisement scheme that our family strongly protests. The basic right of every due-paying member of any organization is to have a say in the election of its office-bearers. If after being a member for three decades we are denied this basic right through a power grab, it may not make any sense to continue being a member.
Agree internet voting
Both Dr.Brojesh Pakrashi and Dr subha Sen pakrashi are supporting the issue Thank you
This sounds like a reasonable and fair option in any voting process. Thank you to all for proposing/facilitating this option!
Don’t screw up my BCS
opportunities should be provided to new talents when they are volunteering to serve BCS community.
It is good for the overall community in the long run .
I strongly feel that the committee in charge of conducting the election (in this case, the Nomination Committee) should have been proactive and taken meaningful steps to ensure that EVERYBODY is able to exercise their right to vote, accepting the options of absentee ballots and online voting. Isn’t it common sense that without those, it will be a clear and intentional case of voter suppression?
All should be allowed to cast their vote as per the constitution of BCS
This is first time in the history of BCS members will elect EC. Every member should have the right to vote.