Democrats argued, during the national debate on health-policy reform, that access to health care is essential because, based upon Harvard University research, an estimated 45,000 Americans die each year for lack of access to appropriate health care. Then, Democrats decided that health protection for the uninsured should be effective in 2013-2014, in another 3-4 years, meaning another 180,000 can die! What gives? Even since Harvard University findings were publicized nationally, and even after those findings were presented directly to various federal judges in court proceedings in Oregon, California, Florida and Georgia on behalf of working-poor uninsured taxpayers forced to pay for the health benefits of others--and, as a result, deprived of funds to obtain their own health insurance and health benefits--those judges refused to even discuss the human rights, much less the Fifth Amendment public-purpose and Fourteenth Amendment equal-protection Constitutional rights, of 46.3 million uninsured Americans. A new form of genocide? Certainly, callous disregard for human life and human rights. Members of Congress have health insurance thanks to American taxpayers. Barack Obama promised Americans the same level of health protection, then he threatened to fine Americans for lack of the same health insurance--health insurance Members of Congress might not otherwise have themselves, except for taxpayers’ generosity. He promised that the legislative negotiation process would be wide open and publicized on C-Span, then Democratic politicians reneged on that promise, too. When the Obama Administration was informed by a Democratic constituent, through the direct E-mail address of the White House Press Secretary, and several times, that it was in error for blaming Republicans for blocking health-care reform, it persisted in spreading the false information. The Democratic constituent pointed out that his now-11-year lawsuit/campaign for either: (1) sending Congress back to the drawing board to correct the equal-protection and public-purpose (Constitutional) deficiencies in government health programs; or (2) a tax exemption for uninsured taxpayers so they can afford to buy health insurance on their own or contract for health services when needed; or (3) Medicare for All (equal health protection under government health-insurance, health-benefits, and health-services laws) was completely under the control of Democratic officials and had been consistently blocked by fellow Democrats, including a former party fund-raiser in the Oregon District and Democratic judicial appointee of President Bill Clinton--supposed supporter of national health insurance—and that the judge could still grant the relief 46.3 million or more working-poor, uninsured taxpayers require, given a pending judicial-misconduct complaint against the judge and Rule 11 (d) of the U.S. Judicial Conference's Rules on Judicial Conduct Proceedings that provides that the court can satisfy plaintiff’s grievances by taking "appropriate corrective action to acknowledge and remedy the problem raised by the complaint." Since Mr. Obama is a constitutional lawyer, he could legitimately suggest that the judicial appointee made a mistake in refusing to even discuss the Constitutional rights invoked. Ever since, of course, Democrats have raised hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions on the mere promise of establishing equal health protection in the future, supported war spending of questionable value by the Bush Administration, and Congress and/or the states have used uninsured taxpayers' Medicare payroll taxes, federal/state/local income-tax payments, federal telephone and other excise-tax payments, state/local sales-tax payments, and, if they pay a mortgage rather than rent, local property-tax payments to help pay for the health benefits of complete strangers: federal civil-service employees, Medicare beneficiaries, Veterans Hospital/Clinic patients, Medicaid recipients, undocumented aliens when in detention, the U.S. prison-inmate population, COBRA enrollees, state civil-service employees, CHIP (Children’s Health Insurance Program) beneficiaries, and school-district and other municipal employees.