Skip to main content

Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.

Appeal to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to amend the Draconian Section 66A of IT Act

Appeal to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to amend the Draconian Section 66A of IT Act

Closed — 429 supporters Verified

Final supporters

S
Someone
S
Someone
S
social b.
Z
zfxssxdtq
N
newboys2013
H
http://lm2008.org/
S
Someone
R
Reena
S
S S.
M
Monish S.
+419 more
Started by Anonymous 13 years, 9 months ago
Two Mumbai girls, Shaheen Dhada and Renu have been sent to jail for tweeting against the bandh observed due to the passing away of Shiv Sena Supremo Balasaheb Thackeray. A fortnight back a businessman Ravi was arrested because he tweeted against Karti Chidambaram, politician and son of Finance Minister P Chidambaram. Politicians and Police are using this Section now to harass citizens. Section 66A of the IT Act passed by the UPA government in 2008 is very draconian in nature. It says that anyone posting an ``offensive'' message in the social media or through electronic media. ``Offensive'' is a loose word used in Section 66A. (see the contents of Section 66A below) WE APPEAL TO PRIME MINISTER MANMOHAN SINGH TO AMEND SECTION 66A IMMEDIATELY AND MAKE IT MORE FOCUSSED SO THAT THE REAL CULPRITS OF SUCH CRIME ARE ONLY PUNISHED AND NOT CITIZENS WHO ARE AIRING THEIR OPINION ON VARIOUS ISSUES IN THIS LARGEST DEMOCRACY OF OURS. What the section says: Section 66A of the IT Act is a relevant section which penalizes ‘sending false and offensive messages through communication services’. The section reads as under – Any person who sends, by means of a computer resource or a communication device,— a)any information that is grossly offensive or has menacing character; or b)any information which he knows to be false, but for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will, persistently by making use of such computer resource or a communication device, c)any electronic mail or electronic mail message for the purpose of causing annoyance or inconvenience or to deceive or to mislead the addressee or recipient about the origin of such messages. Punishment - Imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine. Explanation — For the purpose of this section, terms “electronic mail” and “electronic mail message” means a message or information created or transmitted or received on a computer, computer system, computer resource or communication device including attachments in text, images, audio, video and any other electronic record, which may be transmitted with the message. According to legal experts (courtsey: http://www.chmag.in), the section covers two different acts – ``Sending offensive or menacing messages sent by using electronic communication means; sending false messages to cheat, mislead or deceive people or to cause annoyance to them. While proving false message is relatively easy, but the real question is ‘What constitutes an electronic message to be offensive or of menacing character?’ Indian law has not defined anywhere the meaning of ‘offensive’ or ‘menacing’...'' ``Cyber crimes like, intentionally sending SPAM messages, phishing emails, threatening messages, etc. can also be punished under this section. This section is also applied along with Section 67 or 67B which is related to cyber and child pornography respectively.''

Updates

Reached 250 supporters

November 20, 2012

November 20, 2012

Seeing this momentum grow proves that people are finally refusing to be silenced for simply sharing their own thoughts. It is a relief to know that so many others recognize the danger in these vague laws that target ordinary lives.

Reached 100 supporters

November 20, 2012

November 17, 2012

Seeing people stand up for Shaheen and Renu gives me hope that we can stop this law from ruining more lives. If you have not sent the link to your contacts yet please do it now so we can hit our goal and show the Prime Minister we are watching.

6 Comments

V
Vikram Becker
13 years ago Featured

Police have better things to do than stalk people on fb and twitter. Focus on actual criminals.

A
Amit Okonkwo
13 years ago Featured

TOTAL ABUSE OF POWER. Section 66A needs to go now.

P
Priya Snyder
13 years ago Featured

Ridiculous. They just dont like being questioned. We live in a democracy right?

S
Sanjay Conway
13 years ago Featured

Fix this law immediately.

R
Rahul Reynolds
13 years ago Featured

This makes me so ashamed of our country. Since when is a tweet a crime? Arresting kids for an opinion is just pure cowardice.

S
Sunita Coleman
13 years ago Featured

Free speech is not a crime. Stop harassing regular people just cuz they dont agree with you.