Skip to main content

Alderville First Nation Election Reset

23 Comments

V
Vicki Essert
1 year ago Featured

There was no nominee that resigned! Two nominees DID NOT!!! receive their package from the Electoral Officer. Extremely poor communication for our first election with the new election code. This greatly affected the candidacy of two invested, and worthy members.

B
Bennett smoke
1 year ago Featured

I am in agreement with the nominee who constructed the issue we read here. If a nominee has issues that causes them to resign before election, it would be as simple as a message to membership that for reasons that have happened, the nominee has resigned. End of story. I would rather see that before election day hits and notify all by posted notes and signs etc.

W
Wade Gray
1 year ago

Ffs

J
Jane Marsden
1 year ago

Election Reset!

R
Russell Frederick Cormier III
1 year ago

So what I understand is that maybe the Chief and Council by "Mistakenly , Forgot to tellt Dawn about the Election" especially as she went to a funeral for God Sake and knew nothing about it! Hey Fare is Fare with the band ! And please no discrimining and unfair practices! Especially since "the Majority of the Bands 1st choice for Council would absolutely be Dawn Marie Kelly" ! Rescind The Vote Fare is Fare and business is business

K
Kimberly K Crowe
1 year ago

Totally disagree with the new procedure!!!!

J
Joe Wamsley
1 year ago

Let's get this right!

B
Bruce Smoke
1 year ago

The new election code is obviously flawed and the issues are known is concerning

L
Lori Beaver
1 year ago

The election should be re-done to be fair.

A
Anonymous
1 year ago Featured

I’m showing my support for Dawn Marie, there’s obviously issues with the new election code and this needs to be addressed

D
Darryl Ricky Beaver
1 year ago Featured

I concur. The process and communication regarding changes from previous elections were deficient need to be rectified. I think, without the recommended changes, the process is unfair and unjust.

C
Catherine Davis
1 year ago Featured

3 business days is too short as it is; 3 days, which includes a weekend, unreasonable.

M
Martiena Marsden-Alexander
1 year ago

Totally agree

E
Edna Pennycook
1 year ago

3 days should have been clarified to all candidates

A
Angie Gillman
1 year ago

I truly believe that Dawn Marie should be able to run for council again, she totally beat everyone in our last election, no one but band members should have the right to block anyone from running! It’s our reservation and we should have the right to decide who gets in no matter what Angie Gillman

M
Melanie Marsden
1 year ago

100% agree on this!

V
Victoria Essert
1 year ago

The nominees that would have stood to run in this election should be allowed to. This has been an embarrassment. And handled very poorly.

J
Jack Beaver
1 year ago

This needs to be fixed immediately.

A
April Beaver
1 year ago

Hope this Petition helps :-)

R
Robin Prtersen
1 year ago Featured

I agree 100%. It is unfortunate that members overlooked the section indicating 3 days as opposed to '3 business days.' In legal terms, I wonder if there is any code, contract, etc. that stipulates only 3 days without the 'business days' being identified. I'm guessing many members did not read the entire election code, and without proper identification of that specific section, it was overlooked.