Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.
Final supporters
I am against the motion 103 because it ia against my freedom of speech that I have the right for as per the candian charter of rights and freedom
“I am a Canadian,
a free Canadian,
free to speak without fear,
free to worship in my own way,
free to stand for what I think right,
free to oppose what I believe wrong,
or free to choose those
who shall govern my country.
This heritage of freedom
I pledge to uphold
for myself and all mankind.”
— John Diefenbaker
13th Prime Minister of Canada
1957
More like this
I WILL STAND
We The People Only Wish to be Heard - We Respectfully ask That the Senate…
Updates
February 21, 2017
I have been reading your messages all morning and it is clear that many of you feel the same deep anxiety about what motion 103 risks taking away from us. Losing our ability to speak freely is not a price I am willing to pay for this country. I am currently reaching out to local representatives to ensure they understand that these signatures represent real people who refuse to be silenced.
February 21, 2017
The momentum behind this movement confirms that so many of you share my refusal to let our fundamental rights be eroded. I started this because I believe in the promise of our country and seeing this level of passion proves we are not alone.
17 Comments
My family and I immigrated to Canada in order for us to have a better future and get away from the acts of war and injustice. One thing my parents always stressed to us growing up is the freedom this country would give us and has given us until today. Every citizen of this country should have the right to have an opinion as that's what makes Canadians (all of us) who we are. When that right is taken away from us, yet this privileged is given to others based on their religion, it is not right or just. As a Canadian who believes in freedom and free speech, I vote against motion 103.
No religious group, cult, or political agenda should be given special treatment in a Country like Canada which is a Christian country.
I stand against this motion 103.
Freedom of speech above everything else.
never will we vote for a law to take away our freedom of spesch
I am against this m103 because it is against free of speech
Very disturbing!
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.
Final supporters
I am against the motion 103 because it ia against my freedom of speech that I have the right for as per the candian charter of rights and freedom
“I am a Canadian,
a free Canadian,
free to speak without fear,
free to worship in my own way,
free to stand for what I think right,
free to oppose what I believe wrong,
or free to choose those
who shall govern my country.
This heritage of freedom
I pledge to uphold
for myself and all mankind.”
— John Diefenbaker
13th Prime Minister of Canada
1957
Updates
February 21, 2017
I have been reading your messages all morning and it is clear that many of you feel the same deep anxiety about what motion 103 risks taking away from us. Losing our ability to speak freely is not a price I am willing to pay for this country. I am currently reaching out to local representatives to ensure they understand that these signatures represent real people who refuse to be silenced.
February 21, 2017
The momentum behind this movement confirms that so many of you share my refusal to let our fundamental rights be eroded. I started this because I believe in the promise of our country and seeing this level of passion proves we are not alone.
17 Comments
this motion undermines the intention of our constitution, which is secular and mentions no religions or populations in order to keep it secular and fair for all- this motion specifically refers to 1 religion which makes it non secular and gives preference to 1 group by doing so-if this passes we are no longer a secular country, and that needs a referendum to change so it would be an illegal motion at best . It is also redundant as the constitution already blankets us all with all the same protections and rights. One can only conclude its intent is to cause friction and civil unrest , pitting neighbour against neighbour- friend against friend- and smells distinctly seditious in nature - it cannot be allowed to pass as the consequences are obvious- more division we do not need.
My family and I immigrated to Canada in order for us to have a better future and get away from the acts of war and injustice. One thing my parents always stressed to us growing up is the freedom this country would give us and has given us until today. Every citizen of this country should have the right to have an opinion as that's what makes Canadians (all of us) who we are. When that right is taken away from us, yet this privileged is given to others based on their religion, it is not right or just. As a Canadian who believes in freedom and free speech, I vote against motion 103.
No religious group, cult, or political agenda should be given special treatment in a Country like Canada which is a Christian country.
I stand against this motion 103.
Freedom of speech above everything else.
never will we vote for a law to take away our freedom of spesch
I am against this m103 because it is against free of speech
Very disturbing!
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Looking for similar causes?
Browse similar petitionsScan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
this motion undermines the intention of our constitution, which is secular and mentions no religions or populations in order to keep it secular and fair for all- this motion specifically refers to 1 religion which makes it non secular and gives preference to 1 group by doing so-if this passes we are no longer a secular country, and that needs a referendum to change so it would be an illegal motion at best . It is also redundant as the constitution already blankets us all with all the same protections and rights. One can only conclude its intent is to cause friction and civil unrest , pitting neighbour against neighbour- friend against friend- and smells distinctly seditious in nature - it cannot be allowed to pass as the consequences are obvious- more division we do not need.