Skip to main content

Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside

2,356 Comments

B
Bobby craig
9 years ago

Don't let this go on

C
Carolyn bissell
9 years ago

Bypass which will lose a lovely village community. Why oh why...England's green and pleasant lands are becoming filled with Urban sprawl and clutter. Stop this now and leave some villages for future generations.

K
Kim Wetherall
9 years ago

There is no need for another bypass! Protect England's countryside!

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

Sensible solutions for critical problems. The new yellow route fails at every level.

J
Jo Giles
9 years ago

Preserve what's left of our countryside

M
Merry Foster
10 years ago

Having recently been on this stretch of road it appears that a little improvement to the current roads would solve the problems without destroying the unique countryside

R
Roy Barbour
10 years ago

Save money, save the environment, adopt the purple route.

M
Mrs Sara Child
10 years ago

So much of the land south of the current A27 is built up. Binstead is one of the few surviving rural communities left. Lets preserve it for the future, not destroy it. There is another option which avoids Binstead and looks like it would be much cheaper, using much more of the existing infrastructure. Don't waste public money.

B
Barbara Wills
10 years ago

There are NO advantages of the Binstead option over any other route; one suspects that it is only retained as an (unacceptable) alternative to the pink/blue route. In the interest of democracy both the Red and Purple routes should be revived as viable alternatives.

G
Gerald rubython
10 years ago

Look at the spectacular view from Arundel to the coastl.it would be destroyed by a bridge.Binstead and the woods are lovely.plenty of room for the road to follow existing route splitting at station. Cover new road in a surface tunnel topped with grass. We lived in Arundel Mount Pleasant. The view from Arundel to the coast should be cherished by us all.

S
Scott Robertson
10 years ago

This is a ridiculous option which would destroy Binsted wood, a popular and important area for flora and fauna.

L
Leigh Foster
10 years ago

Concerned for the precious Arundel countryside and local environment. Find a less damaging way to manage traffic in the area!

J
Julie Huggett
10 years ago

I grew up in binsted and my father was head cowman there for many year's, even though I now live in Slindon I always go back to binsted for many walks. Many woodlands are now managed but binsted is left alone and untouched please keep it this way so my grand children can see a natural woodland,untouched and unmanaged!

A
Alison Sandiford
10 years ago

less environmentally destructive alternatives are available

H
Helen Cato
10 years ago

As with the Chichester proposals, the Highways England proposals for Arundel demonstrate little concern for local residents and their property, the environmental impact on areas of outstanding natural beauty, and the actual benefit to the communities affected. I hope that there is wide support for this petition.

S
Steve Adlem
10 years ago

Take a route of minumum destruction to alleviate the worst 'pinch points' and avoid an 'expressway' ambition that will only cause the 'pinch points' to move.

R
Raglan Hay-will
10 years ago

I am familiar with the debate about a bypass as I live at Burpham. I am not opposed in principle to a bypass; however, details do matter sometimes and this is a case in point.

P
Priscilla Page
10 years ago

Destroying unspoilt countryside for more roads is madness. Pursue an on-line option.

H
Helen Spicer
10 years ago

Please do not damage Binsted, it is an important part of our countryside.

R
Robert Bush
10 years ago

An expressway is unnecessary and too expensive. Let's get on with a short route with the avoidance of roundabouts wherever possible.