Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside
2,356 Comments
K
karen fay
8 years ago
I agree instead is too beautiful to be destroyed
M
Michelle Wilson
8 years ago
Such a beautiful quiet place we need to save country side that is a haven for the wildlife and somewhere to walk and enjoy the history of binsted
S
Simon jefferies
8 years ago
Stop the bypass going through bins Ted village and ruining precious woodland
K
Kimjefferies
8 years ago
Don’t ruin more natural habitat this needs to be stopped now people need to be listened to and we never seem to be
C
caroline gudge
8 years ago
it would be dreadful to impact the wildlife, the community and rural businesses by moving forwards with this plan
M
Melangell Roe-Stevens Smith
8 years ago
This plan will destroy six hectares of irreplaceable ancient woodland habitat, which can NEVER be replaced! For the sake of future generations and for the environment. Don't do it.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
I am extremely concerned about the wildlife in this area.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
I have seen Seal's swimming right under where the bridge will be on the river Arun, I am extremely concerned about the wildlife in this area.
B
Bridget Wilson
8 years ago
Please leave the ancient woodlands alone
J
Jean Medlycott
8 years ago
It would be a tragedy to ruin the village and the woods and wildlife by a by-pass.
J
June
8 years ago
A shorter less damaging route for the A27 bypass should be chosen instead of through Binstead Village
D
Darren Harding
8 years ago
Log time resident or Binsted and Walberton, stop 'paving paradise and putting up parking lots'
J
James Mcloughlin
8 years ago
Do not build more roads which will just attract more traffic. do not ruin the natural environment and blight coimmunities
B
Bill Watson
8 years ago
I reject option5A as it is the most damaging to the countryside and village of Binsted -which it will effectively decimate
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Don't destroy Binstead for a highway project - it's not worth it. It's never worth it.
A
Andrew Macintyre, BA Hons (UK)
8 years ago
Induced traffic = build more roads and the traffic will come & fill it. Get the traffic OFF the roads, promote local working business & travel.
M
Mrs V McKay
8 years ago
My
L
Lin Davis
8 years ago
You will lose visitors to your lovely villages and destroy the environment forever.
E
Edmund Camerer Cuss
8 years ago
I personally support the aims of the petition. And I did not think the HE consultation that was run was accurate in what it put forward nor did it fairly represent the situation.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
I used to commute from Rustington to Havant along the A27 5 days a week and the Arundel section was the least of my worries, due to delays at Chichester and Fishbourne. Sacrificing Sussex woodland for the sake of this road is just an awful idea and not something we can undo for future generations.
I agree instead is too beautiful to be destroyed
Such a beautiful quiet place we need to save country side that is a haven for the wildlife and somewhere to walk and enjoy the history of binsted
Stop the bypass going through bins Ted village and ruining precious woodland
Don’t ruin more natural habitat this needs to be stopped now people need to be listened to and we never seem to be
it would be dreadful to impact the wildlife, the community and rural businesses by moving forwards with this plan
This plan will destroy six hectares of irreplaceable ancient woodland habitat, which can NEVER be replaced! For the sake of future generations and for the environment. Don't do it.
I am extremely concerned about the wildlife in this area.
I have seen Seal's swimming right under where the bridge will be on the river Arun, I am extremely concerned about the wildlife in this area.
Please leave the ancient woodlands alone
It would be a tragedy to ruin the village and the woods and wildlife by a by-pass.
A shorter less damaging route for the A27 bypass should be chosen instead of through Binstead Village
Log time resident or Binsted and Walberton, stop 'paving paradise and putting up parking lots'
Do not build more roads which will just attract more traffic. do not ruin the natural environment and blight coimmunities
I reject option5A as it is the most damaging to the countryside and village of Binsted -which it will effectively decimate
Don't destroy Binstead for a highway project - it's not worth it. It's never worth it.
Induced traffic = build more roads and the traffic will come & fill it. Get the traffic OFF the roads, promote local working business & travel.
My
You will lose visitors to your lovely villages and destroy the environment forever.
I personally support the aims of the petition. And I did not think the HE consultation that was run was accurate in what it put forward nor did it fairly represent the situation.
I used to commute from Rustington to Havant along the A27 5 days a week and the Arundel section was the least of my worries, due to delays at Chichester and Fishbourne. Sacrificing Sussex woodland for the sake of this road is just an awful idea and not something we can undo for future generations.