Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside
2,356 Comments
D
Dawn Helen Stringer
10 years ago
A beautiful village would be lost.
M
MiriamWebb
10 years ago
Binsted is a lovely little village and needs to be preserved !
H
Hilary Bibb
10 years ago
This has been ongoing for too long now. More traffic means more hold ups . It won't affect the traders of Arundel. People will still go to Arundel if they want to but going through Binstead is not the answer. It's not rocket science and all these delays and meetings about the bypass is costing more wasted money.
J
Julie Fogden
10 years ago
We are losing to many woodlands to roads better public transport should be the way forward
K
Kathryn Djatmika
10 years ago
Travel either via road or rail in this part of the country is really atrocious
Please don't ruin our heritage by false economy I prefer to sit in a traffic jam or go a longer routec
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I strongly object to Routes 2 (Red), 3 (Tortington Common) and 4 (Binsted Village) which would destroy ancient woodland. Route 1 (Purple Route) would be the only viable solution.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I strongly object to Routes 2 (Red), 3 (Tortington Common) and 4 (Binsted Village) which would destroy ancient woodland. Route 1 (Purple Route) would be the only viable solution.
C
Camilla Lambert
10 years ago
It is vital the least damaging options are on allowed to be considered by the public and that local voices on options currently being side-lined should be listened to
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Protect our countryside, improve and invest in public transport infrastructures instead.
J
John Hughes
10 years ago
Traffic and the pollution it creates is killing us. The government is failing in its duty of care.
Traffic must be reduced along the Chichester - Lancing A27 corridor not build more capacity for more traffic.
N
Nicky Buckley
10 years ago
Other alternatives should be reviewed and presented for public opinion.
C
Chris Lamb
10 years ago
Born in the Bungalow that was knocked down and rebuilt at the entrance of the Rewel woods at the end of Binsted lane. Save the area for the future
M
Marlane Rutledge
10 years ago
The 'purple' route would save Binsted and Tortington, both areas of outstanding natural beauty.
P
Peter Head
10 years ago
It beggars belief that still after so many years the A27 dual carriageway comes to a grinding halt east of Arundel. It really is imperative that the road is constructed so that the traffic can flow freely on towards Chichester, rather than having to edge its way round Arundel.
S
Sara clowes
10 years ago
There is absolutely no need to destroy this beautiful ancient part of West Sussex. There are many alternative options use them not this.
B
Ben kirk
10 years ago
New roads across beatiful countryside are simply not necessary when there are viable options to improve the existing
A beautiful village would be lost.
Binsted is a lovely little village and needs to be preserved !
This has been ongoing for too long now. More traffic means more hold ups . It won't affect the traders of Arundel. People will still go to Arundel if they want to but going through Binstead is not the answer. It's not rocket science and all these delays and meetings about the bypass is costing more wasted money.
We are losing to many woodlands to roads better public transport should be the way forward
Travel either via road or rail in this part of the country is really atrocious Please don't ruin our heritage by false economy I prefer to sit in a traffic jam or go a longer routec
I strongly object to Routes 2 (Red), 3 (Tortington Common) and 4 (Binsted Village) which would destroy ancient woodland. Route 1 (Purple Route) would be the only viable solution.
I strongly object to Routes 2 (Red), 3 (Tortington Common) and 4 (Binsted Village) which would destroy ancient woodland. Route 1 (Purple Route) would be the only viable solution.
It is vital the least damaging options are on allowed to be considered by the public and that local voices on options currently being side-lined should be listened to
Protect our countryside, improve and invest in public transport infrastructures instead.
Traffic and the pollution it creates is killing us. The government is failing in its duty of care. Traffic must be reduced along the Chichester - Lancing A27 corridor not build more capacity for more traffic.
Other alternatives should be reviewed and presented for public opinion.
Born in the Bungalow that was knocked down and rebuilt at the entrance of the Rewel woods at the end of Binsted lane. Save the area for the future
The 'purple' route would save Binsted and Tortington, both areas of outstanding natural beauty.
It beggars belief that still after so many years the A27 dual carriageway comes to a grinding halt east of Arundel. It really is imperative that the road is constructed so that the traffic can flow freely on towards Chichester, rather than having to edge its way round Arundel.
There is absolutely no need to destroy this beautiful ancient part of West Sussex. There are many alternative options use them not this.
New roads across beatiful countryside are simply not necessary when there are viable options to improve the existing