The decision is made, there WILL be a Lower Thames Crossing. It's a stright fight between Option A and Option C. We must stop Option C in any way, shape or variant.
L
Lesley harvey
11 years ago
Having been bought up in shorne and also now live in urban misery please God save the last bastion for wild life and families to enjoy a bit of greenery this is like no other woodland , wild life. It will be sssi and I do believe there is some kind of special charter on site I will look into and post. In the name of sanity why the hell would you even consider. Such an iconic area of outstanding beauty . I'm sure there will be rare plants and such like in this area. It's not about not in my back yard it's about being sensible. The loss of some thing irreplaceable out weighs the other .
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
I strongly oppose option C because
it would take a vast area of green belt land.
K
kim stonehouse
11 years ago
It should be beside the bottle neck to work properly.
C
Clive Parker
11 years ago
Any future crossing wherever it goes will have a detrimental impact on the local area with substantial increase in road traffic and access facilities needed with a greater likelihood of a relaxation of the planning laws to allow business outlets to pop up in the medium to long term future as always once any development occurs its permenant and irreversable lacking a clarity of vision in my opinion
C
Clive Parker
11 years ago
Any future crossing wherever it goes will have a detrimental impact on the local area with substantial increase in road traffic and access facilities needed with a greater likelihood of a relaxation of the planning laws to allow business outlets to pop up in the medium to long term future as always once any development occurs its permenant and irreversable lacking a clarity of vision in my opinion
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
There is precious little countryside left in this part of Kent. With green belt land being hijacked, we do not need more traffic, pollution and noise in this area.
E
E.Spooner
11 years ago
There is precious little countryside left in this part of Kent. With green belt land being hijacked, we do not need more traffic, pollution and noise in this area.
D
David Lang
11 years ago
A senseless option in this particular area blighting both Kent and Essex.
D
David Lang
11 years ago
A senseless option in this particular area blighting both Kent and Essex.
M
Melissa clarke
11 years ago
Would be such a shame such a stunning church with beautiful land. Save our countryside!!
M
Melissa clarke
11 years ago
Would be such a shame such a stunning church with beautiful land. Save our countryside!!
E
Edward Threlfall
11 years ago
A river crossing at this point would a)considerably ad to the excessive traffic using the A2 already fed by the Channel port in Kent.
B) would destroy the beautifully peacefull countryside of this part of Kent, and the flora and fauna.
E
Edward Threlfall
11 years ago
A river crossing at this point would a)considerably ad to the excessive traffic using the A2 already fed by the Channel port in Kent.
B) would destroy the beautifully peacefull countryside of this part of Kent, and the flora and fauna.
V
Victoria Whitehead
11 years ago
It makes sense to keep the crossing point where it is rather than destroy the beautiful countryside
H
Helga Morady
12 years ago
The wildlife and the nature of this peaceful place will be destroyed. The animals, the greenery, the woods, the open fields, the agriculture, all of this will be replaced by noise pollution & air pollution. It doesn't make any sense. Why would someone want to destroy this nature's gift. I open my windows and all I hear are the birds. To think that this will no longer be part of the future in this area, makes me sick.
G
Gareth Pottle
12 years ago
Madness.
S
stephen watkins
12 years ago
this bridge is not needed in this lovely area and would destroy hiham and shorne.
The decision is made, there WILL be a Lower Thames Crossing. It's a stright fight between Option A and Option C. We must stop Option C in any way, shape or variant.
Having been bought up in shorne and also now live in urban misery please God save the last bastion for wild life and families to enjoy a bit of greenery this is like no other woodland , wild life. It will be sssi and I do believe there is some kind of special charter on site I will look into and post. In the name of sanity why the hell would you even consider. Such an iconic area of outstanding beauty . I'm sure there will be rare plants and such like in this area. It's not about not in my back yard it's about being sensible. The loss of some thing irreplaceable out weighs the other .
I strongly oppose option C because it would take a vast area of green belt land.
It should be beside the bottle neck to work properly.
Any future crossing wherever it goes will have a detrimental impact on the local area with substantial increase in road traffic and access facilities needed with a greater likelihood of a relaxation of the planning laws to allow business outlets to pop up in the medium to long term future as always once any development occurs its permenant and irreversable lacking a clarity of vision in my opinion
Any future crossing wherever it goes will have a detrimental impact on the local area with substantial increase in road traffic and access facilities needed with a greater likelihood of a relaxation of the planning laws to allow business outlets to pop up in the medium to long term future as always once any development occurs its permenant and irreversable lacking a clarity of vision in my opinion
There is precious little countryside left in this part of Kent. With green belt land being hijacked, we do not need more traffic, pollution and noise in this area.
There is precious little countryside left in this part of Kent. With green belt land being hijacked, we do not need more traffic, pollution and noise in this area.
A senseless option in this particular area blighting both Kent and Essex.
A senseless option in this particular area blighting both Kent and Essex.
Would be such a shame such a stunning church with beautiful land. Save our countryside!!
Would be such a shame such a stunning church with beautiful land. Save our countryside!!
A river crossing at this point would a)considerably ad to the excessive traffic using the A2 already fed by the Channel port in Kent. B) would destroy the beautifully peacefull countryside of this part of Kent, and the flora and fauna.
A river crossing at this point would a)considerably ad to the excessive traffic using the A2 already fed by the Channel port in Kent. B) would destroy the beautifully peacefull countryside of this part of Kent, and the flora and fauna.
It makes sense to keep the crossing point where it is rather than destroy the beautiful countryside
The wildlife and the nature of this peaceful place will be destroyed. The animals, the greenery, the woods, the open fields, the agriculture, all of this will be replaced by noise pollution & air pollution. It doesn't make any sense. Why would someone want to destroy this nature's gift. I open my windows and all I hear are the birds. To think that this will no longer be part of the future in this area, makes me sick.
Madness.
this bridge is not needed in this lovely area and would destroy hiham and shorne.