Redesign or Stop the 19-Home Development on Mulholland and San Feliciano!
347 Comments
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Save our oks!
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Stop building here.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Dont cut this tree down please.
L
Laurie Amigo
6 years ago
We need to save the trees!
S
Sharon Freilich
6 years ago
I am appalled that this development is not listening to the neighbors in the area regarding the density of the project as well as the following:
Disruption of wildlife refuge & transit link to nearby Santa Monica Mountains
No prior review by the Design Review Board of the Mulholland Scenic Parkway Specific Plan as required by law, at the western entrance to the historic Mulholland Scenic Parkway
Lack of a viable, less intrusive, less dense alternative plan by the developer as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). I walked by this open space almost every day as part of maintaining my mental and physical health. During heavy rains I always thought of this area as a deterrent to flooding further down the hill. I am not saying do not develop this as it is private land and you have a right to develop. I am saying to develop with aesthetic and intelligence and to follow the rules of planning that have been put in place for the area and for the people that reside in and near this historic open space. Which includes myself.
Thank you.
Sharon Freilich
D
Deborah Sheiner
6 years ago
Please protect our environment
T
Trudi Keck
6 years ago
Preserve our trees! Planning and zoning guidelines in question!
P
Peter Colley
6 years ago
As a 30-year resident of Woodland Hills, losing this precious natural landmark with all those century old trees would be tragic.
B
Bois
6 years ago
Sad. We live among idiots.
C
Carlos Duque
· petition starter
6 years ago
Apparently they are protected by the Director of City Planning who can chose to protect them or kill them, at his pleasure.
S
Sal stewart
6 years ago
It is unconscionable to cut down these old live oaks. Get another plan that allows them to stand and be forever protected.
R
Rosadel McClure
6 years ago
Stop the destruction of our valuable resource.
B
Barton Chiate
6 years ago
I was under the impression that coastal oaks ere protected
J
Janet Burns
6 years ago
Stop development in wildlands.
R
Roberta Havens
6 years ago
We want a proper hearing before approval is granted for development. There are numerous reasons to reject this development.
C
Catherine Kazemi
6 years ago
This area is too beautiful to be destroyed! Keep it as a park.
C
Cynthia Johnson
6 years ago
I am sick of progress and how it harms such Beautiful Nature ! This sickens me ! Why the greed ? Please leave this GIFT alone !
D
David's Schwartz
6 years ago
Previously bankrupt developer and his cronies have shown a consistent and unwavering disregard for the rules. They are conniving, underhanded, untrustworthy and have no regard for anything except their own self interests. It's time LA sent a message that douche bag developers are no longer welcome in this city and that crony capatalism needs to die
M
Michael Gross
6 years ago
Calabasas
E
Ellen Garrett
6 years ago
I am against granting permission to build this tract of homes. Protect the oaks and hillsides of our neighborhood. The last thing we need is another tract. When all the oaks are gone, how lamentable it will be. And we cannot bring them back.
Save our oks!
Stop building here.
Dont cut this tree down please.
We need to save the trees!
I am appalled that this development is not listening to the neighbors in the area regarding the density of the project as well as the following: Disruption of wildlife refuge & transit link to nearby Santa Monica Mountains No prior review by the Design Review Board of the Mulholland Scenic Parkway Specific Plan as required by law, at the western entrance to the historic Mulholland Scenic Parkway Lack of a viable, less intrusive, less dense alternative plan by the developer as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). I walked by this open space almost every day as part of maintaining my mental and physical health. During heavy rains I always thought of this area as a deterrent to flooding further down the hill. I am not saying do not develop this as it is private land and you have a right to develop. I am saying to develop with aesthetic and intelligence and to follow the rules of planning that have been put in place for the area and for the people that reside in and near this historic open space. Which includes myself. Thank you. Sharon Freilich
Please protect our environment
Preserve our trees! Planning and zoning guidelines in question!
As a 30-year resident of Woodland Hills, losing this precious natural landmark with all those century old trees would be tragic.
Sad. We live among idiots.
Apparently they are protected by the Director of City Planning who can chose to protect them or kill them, at his pleasure.
It is unconscionable to cut down these old live oaks. Get another plan that allows them to stand and be forever protected.
Stop the destruction of our valuable resource.
I was under the impression that coastal oaks ere protected
Stop development in wildlands.
We want a proper hearing before approval is granted for development. There are numerous reasons to reject this development.
This area is too beautiful to be destroyed! Keep it as a park.
I am sick of progress and how it harms such Beautiful Nature ! This sickens me ! Why the greed ? Please leave this GIFT alone !
Previously bankrupt developer and his cronies have shown a consistent and unwavering disregard for the rules. They are conniving, underhanded, untrustworthy and have no regard for anything except their own self interests. It's time LA sent a message that douche bag developers are no longer welcome in this city and that crony capatalism needs to die
Calabasas
I am against granting permission to build this tract of homes. Protect the oaks and hillsides of our neighborhood. The last thing we need is another tract. When all the oaks are gone, how lamentable it will be. And we cannot bring them back.