Redesign or Stop the 19-Home Development on Mulholland and San Feliciano!
347 Comments
J
Jaime DiMarco
6 years ago
I hate developers ruining our beautiful Oaks!
A
Anthony Crivello
6 years ago
Move your development elsewhere. We are single family residential. I suggest Canoga Park. Massive plans for development are in place there where residential buildings with multiple units will fit right in. You care nothing about this neighborhood or Mulholland Drive & Mulholland Highway preservation, preservation of trees and wetlands, nor do you care about the effect you will have on Louisville High School. You will create nothing but more traffic, and we cannot handle more in the area !!
L
Lynne Mazer
6 years ago
This is such a terrible thing that was let thru during the Coronavirus lockdown. Shameful
D
Dino Moriana
6 years ago
STOP removing trees! You are contributing to Global Warming! We don't need anymore construction.
M
Mary Sobel
6 years ago
Do not destroy these wonderful, living, beautiful, ancient trees. We need them to be protected because they are helping to protect our planet.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
No more development in Woodland Hills.
W
Wayne Kennan
6 years ago
Are there any infrastructure improvements associated with this development? A new water source? Traffic mitigation? Educational and recreational allowances?
S
Stephen Berger
6 years ago
Development and preservation can exist together. Do the right thing!!
Z
Zenna Evans
6 years ago
Each and every one of the native coastal live oak matters! It would be inhuman to cut down #114 (or any more for tha TV matter)!
J
Julie Zagha
6 years ago
Keep the Oaks and this unique property safe! No development.
A
Alison Kenney
6 years ago
What is the point of having city codes and plans if they aren't to be enforced? Does anyone believe a private property owner (rather than a developer building a community of homes) would be granted similar deference? These new homes should be designed to fit in with the neighborhood, and access should not involve a dangerous new intersection on a steep, 'blind' hill.
A
Ampora Yazdani
6 years ago
Save The Oak
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Stop this stupid development
D
Deann Dover
6 years ago
Save our open space. Stop construction!!
S
Sandra Marsden
6 years ago
Lawsuit
D
Donna Ashley
6 years ago
How about a public park?
M
Max H Penner
6 years ago
Native born Topangan of 70 years. My home was built around an oak that is over one hundred years old. The my house was first built in 1934 and burnt down in 1943. The house was rebuilt around the same oak, which survived the fire. I remodeled the house in 1992, and the oak still has a home. Save the oaks and let them let us live around them:-)
P
Peter Bernstein
6 years ago
Leave that land alone.
J
Jill Stewart
6 years ago
Praying the developer is slowed to stop by the all but certain recession and has to call off the bulldozers. In SF, Sacramento, Seattle, Austin, Santa Monica, Houston, even Cleveland and Pittsburg and a couple dozen other cities, this heritage tree destruction would be banned. Buildings would have to coexist if built at all. These dramatic kills of heritage trees are supported by our City Councilman and Mayor. Their environmental sophistication is Circa 1990s, they’ve been educated by many many voices, and they’ve failed to learn.
E
Edward Albrecht
6 years ago
Oppose this project as proposed. Scope has too many units for the site.
I hate developers ruining our beautiful Oaks!
Move your development elsewhere. We are single family residential. I suggest Canoga Park. Massive plans for development are in place there where residential buildings with multiple units will fit right in. You care nothing about this neighborhood or Mulholland Drive & Mulholland Highway preservation, preservation of trees and wetlands, nor do you care about the effect you will have on Louisville High School. You will create nothing but more traffic, and we cannot handle more in the area !!
This is such a terrible thing that was let thru during the Coronavirus lockdown. Shameful
STOP removing trees! You are contributing to Global Warming! We don't need anymore construction.
Do not destroy these wonderful, living, beautiful, ancient trees. We need them to be protected because they are helping to protect our planet.
No more development in Woodland Hills.
Are there any infrastructure improvements associated with this development? A new water source? Traffic mitigation? Educational and recreational allowances?
Development and preservation can exist together. Do the right thing!!
Each and every one of the native coastal live oak matters! It would be inhuman to cut down #114 (or any more for tha TV matter)!
Keep the Oaks and this unique property safe! No development.
What is the point of having city codes and plans if they aren't to be enforced? Does anyone believe a private property owner (rather than a developer building a community of homes) would be granted similar deference? These new homes should be designed to fit in with the neighborhood, and access should not involve a dangerous new intersection on a steep, 'blind' hill.
Save The Oak
Stop this stupid development
Save our open space. Stop construction!!
Lawsuit
How about a public park?
Native born Topangan of 70 years. My home was built around an oak that is over one hundred years old. The my house was first built in 1934 and burnt down in 1943. The house was rebuilt around the same oak, which survived the fire. I remodeled the house in 1992, and the oak still has a home. Save the oaks and let them let us live around them:-)
Leave that land alone.
Praying the developer is slowed to stop by the all but certain recession and has to call off the bulldozers. In SF, Sacramento, Seattle, Austin, Santa Monica, Houston, even Cleveland and Pittsburg and a couple dozen other cities, this heritage tree destruction would be banned. Buildings would have to coexist if built at all. These dramatic kills of heritage trees are supported by our City Councilman and Mayor. Their environmental sophistication is Circa 1990s, they’ve been educated by many many voices, and they’ve failed to learn.
Oppose this project as proposed. Scope has too many units for the site.