NCAA Division III Student-Athletes opposed to cutting schedules
309 Comments
H
Hannah Lee
11 years ago
As Division III athletes, we are the only athletes performing our sport with no benefits except that we love the challenge and the talents we have. We make sacrifices and train with no benefits except our love. This is true dedication. Don't limit us.
R
Robby Bastle
11 years ago
N/A
J
Justin Barney
11 years ago
The schedule for competing is already short enough.
D
Daytona Bryden
11 years ago
We already are put at the bottom of the priority list, do not harm us anymore.
L
liz negron
11 years ago
oppose..my son enjoys the balance of both n the games n schedule...he lives the game of football
N
Nick Kuhlmann
11 years ago
Go hawks!!!
M
Matt Sonnenberg
11 years ago
This foolishly arbitrary.
S
Stephen Koh
11 years ago
Each sport and school should determine for this on their own. 10% across the board seems arbitrary to me.
M
Mike Prue
11 years ago
This is silly
L
Linda Kurek
11 years ago
I am a parent who believes opposes Prop. 2-7
P
Peyton Tebon
11 years ago
I just finished my season in the first round of the NCAA tournament and I couldn't imagine a shorter season. Please no cuts.
J
Joseph Sagat
11 years ago
No on Prop 2-7. A lot of great atheletes go to D3 to focus on school but want to play. Don't cut what they love at the D3 level. Remember what sports and a college education is all about.
As the father of a former D3 Baseball player, the schedule is already light enough. Extend it - don't shorten it.
L
Laura Treadwell
11 years ago
There is no reason to restrict division iii athletes any more than the NCAA does. We choose to participate in intercollegiate athletics at division iii schools knowing full well the responsibilities that are attached. We are already highly restricted in the off season and pre-seasons, please do not add the regular season to this list unnecessarily.
P
paula gilger
11 years ago
dont take any games away
C
Cory White
11 years ago
D3 is the has the purist love for the sport in the ncaa. We don't compete for money just the love of our team and sport. Stop taking away from us.
As Division III athletes, we are the only athletes performing our sport with no benefits except that we love the challenge and the talents we have. We make sacrifices and train with no benefits except our love. This is true dedication. Don't limit us.
N/A
The schedule for competing is already short enough.
We already are put at the bottom of the priority list, do not harm us anymore.
oppose..my son enjoys the balance of both n the games n schedule...he lives the game of football
Go hawks!!!
This foolishly arbitrary.
Each sport and school should determine for this on their own. 10% across the board seems arbitrary to me.
This is silly
I am a parent who believes opposes Prop. 2-7
I just finished my season in the first round of the NCAA tournament and I couldn't imagine a shorter season. Please no cuts.
No on Prop 2-7. A lot of great atheletes go to D3 to focus on school but want to play. Don't cut what they love at the D3 level. Remember what sports and a college education is all about.
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Stop this BULLSHIT
no!
[email protected]
As the father of a former D3 Baseball player, the schedule is already light enough. Extend it - don't shorten it.
There is no reason to restrict division iii athletes any more than the NCAA does. We choose to participate in intercollegiate athletics at division iii schools knowing full well the responsibilities that are attached. We are already highly restricted in the off season and pre-seasons, please do not add the regular season to this list unnecessarily.
dont take any games away
D3 is the has the purist love for the sport in the ncaa. We don't compete for money just the love of our team and sport. Stop taking away from us.