Skip to main content

Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.

St. John the Evangelist Winter Sanctuary

St. John the Evangelist Winter Sanctuary

Closed — 11 supporters Verified

Final supporters

V
Vicki V.
S
Someone
K
Kent H.
S
Someone
A
Anna M.
M
Marilee M.
S
Scott B.
S
Someone
R
Rick G.
A
Anne g.
+1 more
RF
Started by Robert Fuentes 8 years, 9 months ago

From December 31, 2017 to January 6, 2018, St. John the Evangelist Parish will be hosting a winter sanctuary for the homeless. Up to 25 people will be served dinner and lodged in one of the buildings on the school campus. They will arrive at 6:30PM and depart at 6AM each day.

This is a worthy program in the spirit of Christianity. As Christians, we have been called upon to serve those in need.

As Christians, we are also obligated to protect the weak. For our children attending St. John the Evangelist School, their school is a haven. Similarly, parents assume the safety and well-being of their children will always be first and foremost.

While the winter sanctuary program is worthy, the choice of location potentially jeopardizes our weakest: our children.

The Diocese goes through great effort to safeguard the children of St. John the Evangelist School: the Safe Environment (formerly Shield the Vulnerable) program, fingerprint/livescan requirements, and a closed campus are examples.

The participants in the winter sanctuary are expected to remain in the temporary lodging. However, national fire code does not permit locking or blocking of fire exits from within buildings. The doors that open to the school campus must therefore remain operable and accessible. Consequently, the only safeguard to unauthorized personnel entering campus from the temporary shelter would be security guards. Well-intentioned volunteers may not be sufficient.

Communicable diseases and drug use are unfortunately common among the homeless. Though volunteers will be cleaning the shelter each morning, hidden needles and unintentionally missed surfaces can harbor contagious, serious viruses up to 3 weeks.

Those who sign this petition are acknowledging the value of the winter sanctuary program but requesting a change in venue off campus.

6 Comments

M
Mike Barnes
8 years ago Featured

This is completely reckless. You cant just mix random people in with elementary kids and hope for the best. Keep the shelter away from the school grounds.

V
Vicki Volek
8 years ago Featured

As a Christian, grandmother, and supporter of St. John school, I am very opposed to this idea. The safety of our children, teachers, and parents are in the forefront. Please do not let this go forward in this manner.

S
Scott Brownholtz
8 years ago

There needs to be a clear firewall between the SJE children and the homeless.

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

As an employee of Saint Francis High School I have to go to rigerous screening and background checks in order to even step on campus to interact with our Student Athletes, I firmly believe the Catholic Church has set forth these standards to protect our children. Any Catholic campus, in order to set a high standard of protection for our children as well as protecting the dedicated Staff should require these high standards to remain in effect for any adult on a campus which serves children. The idea and plan to have people reside in a Catholic School setting should require even more rigerous standards of medical and mental testing as well as a complete back ground and fingerprint check to ensure the continued safety of the children and staff who attend any school location through out the school year. To not go to extreme measures when planning to house overnight guests on a school campus would prove wildly negligent and putting students and staff at an unnecessary risk during the duration of the housing. While one can appreciate the desire to help, to add any element to SJE a Catholic School that may make our families who seek and pay for a Catholic education, feel that their children maybe not be at a school where their safety and care is the top priority is risky and disregard for parents concerns is completely shortsighted. Voluntarily putting any child at risk is a chance that the Catholic Schools cannot comprise on. If the safety and health of the Children and Staff cannot be guaranteed, which this plan cannot, then I pray that the safety of all SJE children and Staff be put in front of this plan. What is further disturbing is that this plan was not discussed with families of the School prior to consenting the duel use of school facilities to house homeless nor was the CSAC board prior enlightened on this controversial plan and the decision to simply implement this plan with out discussion and input from school families shows a complete disregard for the s

R
Rick Glass
8 years ago

CURE OR ENABLE? Before addressing the symptoms (vagrancy, more and more Homeless sleeping in parking lots, businesses, public areas, cars, begging ,, in need.....) Do you think we should try and CURE the problem with a proven path to recovery or do we continue to allow this to manufest itself and grow by addressing symptoms. Enabling and supporting the Homeless lifestyle is a grave travesty! Unintended consequences often worsen the problem, and cause even more homeless issues in our neighborhoods. And even greater Homeless migration to those who support that lifestyle and NOT the cure. Effectively Treating the Homeless by identifying and providing requisite solutions to their core problems (mental illness and substance abuse, etc) will begin to cure those problems and provide these brothers and sisters a path to recovery and productivity. If we don't address their problems and begin to CURE them we keep Homeless on the street and inflate the stress, strain, blight and crime in our neighborhoods. Haven't we already learned that providing just a refuge, money, food and shelter without addressing their core problem only exasperates the Homelessness, attracts even more vagrancy, crime, loitering etc?? Loaves and Fishes has the facility, the trained staff, the programs, the resources & the track record to effectively address the Homeless' problems, initiate the path to cure and productivity, But, the Homeless are not seeking the CURE...., they don't want Loaves and Fishes, they want to sustain their lifestyle. CURE or Enable? What are the consequences? Have you noticed what happens in evenings at Carmichael Park (the congregation of Homeless with bikes and backpacks) The van they've been waiting for finally arrives. Homeless empty their backpacks of "goods"and the "Trades" take place in broad daylight........Where did those goods come from? Why would we enable this behavior?

R
Rick Glass
8 years ago

Unintended