Skip to main content

Rejection of RRC extension

103 Comments

K
Karl Lawrenz
5 years ago

A definite no

S
Sanet De Ruiter
5 years ago Featured

Too much congestion on Gary Increased risk to security in adding another gate No real obligation on the developers or body corporate to follow through on their promise putting the increased burden of management and payments on the RRC community

A
Anders Henriksson
5 years ago

No

K
Keitu
5 years ago

Vote No, from 3 Shelly Street

M
Mpumelelo Nhlapo
5 years ago

Our Vote is no to opening the gate.

7
7 Gary street
5 years ago

No

D
Debbie Cox
5 years ago

No. Increased security risk. Blockage at exit and entry affecting wessels. No real reason to other than to improve developers sales

P
Pete Borrino
5 years ago

No to these changes

G
Gabby Sequeira
5 years ago

No from 39 River Road.

B
Barbara Hyde
5 years ago

Reject

R
Rose Moodley
5 years ago

I say No ...our security will be compromised.. Bevan Road

J
Jabu
5 years ago

The smaller our enclosure the safer it will be.

K
Kiruben Naicker
5 years ago

No. 11 shelley street.

A
Aslam
5 years ago

It’s a no from us. We do not want to compromise the security of the area.

I
Ilana
5 years ago

No , 46 river road

C
Cathy Maree
5 years ago

Agreed with registering a NO vote.

L
Loti and Faith Kingori 28E River Road
5 years ago

We are concerned about depreciation of our property value, compromised security, rapid deterioration of infrastructure that will ensue with opening of Shelly street

D
Denver Biggs
5 years ago

No from 27B River Road

D
Dennis Holden
5 years ago

no

M
Mary Hattingh
5 years ago

No