Petition against multiple Section 20 notices issued
10 Comments
S
Simon Obi
9 months ago
Featured
The lack of detail on these costs is shocking. How can they expect us to just pay up without seeing any quotes or proper proof of why this work is needed now?
N
Nik Majithia
9 months ago
Featured
Agree with the consensus here - there seems to be no comms outside of some sporadic letters. Formal meetings are required to understand why these works are required.
H
Heena pontin
9 months ago
Featured
In agreement with the areas of concern for leaseholders living on the development. It’s unacceptable to keep receiving huge demands due to poor accounting and lack of transparency and inadequate consultation with leaseholders who are required to foot the bill.
A
Aamna F
9 months ago
I reject all additional work and upgrade request.
A
Ali Shaikh
9 months ago
Featured
Please reduce cost of operations to bare minimum. No additional work or upgrade is needed.
G
Garima Singh
9 months ago
Featured
We need clarity on the section 20 notices. There has not been any consultation and the process is very unfair.
G
Gerald Peter Diamond
9 months ago
Attorney for Colin J Diamond
R
Rupa Das
· petition starter
9 months ago
Fully support this petition as some of these even seem unjustified - like the cold-water booster. Similar unjustified issues with the ongoing sewage septic tank issue where Estate Manager seems to be forcing residents to pay for investigations and cleanups which are unrelated to the sewage odour and not even needed in most cases so far. Ordering such expensive unjustified-cleanups seems like a ploy to earn commissions rather than actually holding the Yearly Service Provider (London Drainage in this case) liable. Similarly issues with Car Park where water seepage has been an ongoing issue since 2018 which Residents have not only had to pay for again and again for the same work to be redone, but also have to keep cleaning their cars far more times in a week due to the limescale/white dust falling onto their car due to the leak.
T
Tirthankar Bhattacharjee
9 months ago
Featured
Need further understanding and transparency of how these (s29 notices) expenses were incurred, any prior communication and consultation with residents before spending.
R
Robert Keller
9 months ago
Agree these notices are neither clear nor transparent
The lack of detail on these costs is shocking. How can they expect us to just pay up without seeing any quotes or proper proof of why this work is needed now?
Agree with the consensus here - there seems to be no comms outside of some sporadic letters. Formal meetings are required to understand why these works are required.
In agreement with the areas of concern for leaseholders living on the development. It’s unacceptable to keep receiving huge demands due to poor accounting and lack of transparency and inadequate consultation with leaseholders who are required to foot the bill.
I reject all additional work and upgrade request.
Please reduce cost of operations to bare minimum. No additional work or upgrade is needed.
We need clarity on the section 20 notices. There has not been any consultation and the process is very unfair.
Attorney for Colin J Diamond
Fully support this petition as some of these even seem unjustified - like the cold-water booster. Similar unjustified issues with the ongoing sewage septic tank issue where Estate Manager seems to be forcing residents to pay for investigations and cleanups which are unrelated to the sewage odour and not even needed in most cases so far. Ordering such expensive unjustified-cleanups seems like a ploy to earn commissions rather than actually holding the Yearly Service Provider (London Drainage in this case) liable. Similarly issues with Car Park where water seepage has been an ongoing issue since 2018 which Residents have not only had to pay for again and again for the same work to be redone, but also have to keep cleaning their cars far more times in a week due to the limescale/white dust falling onto their car due to the leak.
Need further understanding and transparency of how these (s29 notices) expenses were incurred, any prior communication and consultation with residents before spending.
Agree these notices are neither clear nor transparent