naravno da ne...koliko samo crkvi je unisteno pod tim razularenim albancima
G
Gordana Manojlovic
11 years ago
Kosovo i Metohija je Srbsko zanavek!
N
Nikola
11 years ago
Живело Србско Косово!!!
L
Luka Nedeljkovic
11 years ago
Kosovo is Serbia!
N
NatasaZivkovic
11 years ago
ne Kosovo u UNESKO
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Nikada..nikada
B
Branislav Jovano
11 years ago
Ne zasuzuje Kosovo u Unesko.
Ja sam protiv prijema ubica u UN..
Z
Zdravko
11 years ago
No Kosovo Unesco
D
Dragan Stajić
11 years ago
KOSMET je uvek bio i biće SRPSKI. Prekinite više da KOSMET zovete Kosovo. Ima isto 6 slova a ne negira se Metohija, što znači crkveno zemljište. KOSMET i tačka.
M
Milos Inic
11 years ago
Na way Schipptar to be part of Unesco
They stole our land with the help of Nato but won't take our soul
T
Trevorpery
11 years ago
No Unrsco
K
Klasic Momcilo
11 years ago
No Kosovo Unesco
D
danilo ivanovic
11 years ago
No Kosovo in Unesco
D
Dardan Kosova
11 years ago
Fjodor needs to know that 15 years rule of tsar dusan (1355) and few others on the territories of Kosova and its Christian heritage does not make it belong to Belgrade, but for sure it belongs to Pristina as the capital of Rep. of Kosova. During dusans expansion of territories the Byzantium was weak so he occupied the area (up to Greece) but that does not mean any of the territory nor the churches occupied for only 15 years belong to the ‘sick dream’ of srbs. During the srb attacks a lot of monasteries were damaged by srbs and were abandoned (Byzantium church crisis) due to conflicts but rebuild by the local people and Albanian Lords in some cases (see Hilandar Monastery Greece ‘example’, built in Greece and of course it belongs to Greeks even though was REBUILD by Srbs and Albanian Lords, we are not claiming that since Greece/UNESCO is taking care of it), but the story the srbs are sticking is that they BUILD new Monasteries and now they belong to them!!! Which is only a LIE and a typical attitude happening all the time: serbs love to lie them self, they did rebuild some churches on top of the ruins but on Kosova never BUILD from scratch but srbs never take in consideration what the history, they only quote their first sources.
Hilandar is first mentioned in a Greek manuscript of 1015 as being "completely abandoned and empty", for which reason it was given to the monastery of Kastamonitou. It was certainly established a good hundred years earlier: a certain George Chelandarios (Boatman), mentioned among important Athonites in 980, was probably the founder of the monastery, which was subsequently called after him.
The monastery's name appears thus in Greek acts of the 11th and 12th centuries, but later, in the first Serbian sources, it takes the form of Hilandar (D. Anastasijevich). At that time the monastery was already dedicated to the Presentation of the Virgin in the Temple (November 21). The last appearance of the form Chelandar is in a Protaton act of 1169
M
marica burzan
11 years ago
Albanci u nepostojecoj drzavi Kosovo ne mogu cuvati SRPSKE SVETINJE,nisu ih dostojni
Mrs
Kosovo Srbija !
.......
NO TO SERBIAN COSOVO IN UNESCO !!
naravno da ne...koliko samo crkvi je unisteno pod tim razularenim albancima
Kosovo i Metohija je Srbsko zanavek!
Живело Србско Косово!!!
Kosovo is Serbia!
ne Kosovo u UNESKO
Nikada..nikada
Ne zasuzuje Kosovo u Unesko. Ja sam protiv prijema ubica u UN..
No Kosovo Unesco
KOSMET je uvek bio i biće SRPSKI. Prekinite više da KOSMET zovete Kosovo. Ima isto 6 slova a ne negira se Metohija, što znači crkveno zemljište. KOSMET i tačka.
Na way Schipptar to be part of Unesco They stole our land with the help of Nato but won't take our soul
No Unrsco
No Kosovo Unesco
No Kosovo in Unesco
Fjodor needs to know that 15 years rule of tsar dusan (1355) and few others on the territories of Kosova and its Christian heritage does not make it belong to Belgrade, but for sure it belongs to Pristina as the capital of Rep. of Kosova. During dusans expansion of territories the Byzantium was weak so he occupied the area (up to Greece) but that does not mean any of the territory nor the churches occupied for only 15 years belong to the ‘sick dream’ of srbs. During the srb attacks a lot of monasteries were damaged by srbs and were abandoned (Byzantium church crisis) due to conflicts but rebuild by the local people and Albanian Lords in some cases (see Hilandar Monastery Greece ‘example’, built in Greece and of course it belongs to Greeks even though was REBUILD by Srbs and Albanian Lords, we are not claiming that since Greece/UNESCO is taking care of it), but the story the srbs are sticking is that they BUILD new Monasteries and now they belong to them!!! Which is only a LIE and a typical attitude happening all the time: serbs love to lie them self, they did rebuild some churches on top of the ruins but on Kosova never BUILD from scratch but srbs never take in consideration what the history, they only quote their first sources. Hilandar is first mentioned in a Greek manuscript of 1015 as being "completely abandoned and empty", for which reason it was given to the monastery of Kastamonitou. It was certainly established a good hundred years earlier: a certain George Chelandarios (Boatman), mentioned among important Athonites in 980, was probably the founder of the monastery, which was subsequently called after him. The monastery's name appears thus in Greek acts of the 11th and 12th centuries, but later, in the first Serbian sources, it takes the form of Hilandar (D. Anastasijevich). At that time the monastery was already dedicated to the Presentation of the Virgin in the Temple (November 21). The last appearance of the form Chelandar is in a Protaton act of 1169
Albanci u nepostojecoj drzavi Kosovo ne mogu cuvati SRPSKE SVETINJE,nisu ih dostojni
Decenijska otimacina!!!