Request that FDA require MR manufacturers to provide 3D RF field plots
143 Comments
L
Lisa Jones
6 years ago
Lincoln, IL USA
M
Michelle Brinkley
6 years ago
Olney, Md
J
Julie Patterson
6 years ago
This is so important to the safety of patients having MR imaging.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Hermon, Maine
A
Asha Pepe
6 years ago
West Palm Beach, Florida
R
Rose Gleason
6 years ago
Springfield,Illinois US
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Camden, NJ
USA
T
Tammie Hemingway RTRMMRMRSO
6 years ago
West Bath, Maine
J
John Cronk
6 years ago
Morganton, NC
J
John Cronk
6 years ago
Morganton, NC
S
Shannon Tripp
6 years ago
Spokane, Washington
M
Marthe Bergland Jørgensen
6 years ago
Tromsø, Norway
S
Scott Brummett
6 years ago
Featured
As an advisor to the attending radiologist invoked in the risk vs benefit decision making process on scanning under various circumstances, this information is vital to ensure patient safety.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Fenton, MI USA
T
Theresa Hayes
6 years ago
Arcadia California
J
Joel Lemus
6 years ago
Seattle, WA
E
Eric Romereim
6 years ago
Colorado Springs, CO
L
Lucia Madrigal
6 years ago
The actual visual of the RF mapping makes better sense than the plots on graphs.
Lincoln, IL USA
Olney, Md
This is so important to the safety of patients having MR imaging.
Hermon, Maine
West Palm Beach, Florida
Springfield,Illinois US
Camden, NJ USA
West Bath, Maine
Morganton, NC
Morganton, NC
Spokane, Washington
Tromsø, Norway
As an advisor to the attending radiologist invoked in the risk vs benefit decision making process on scanning under various circumstances, this information is vital to ensure patient safety.
Fenton, MI USA
Arcadia California
Seattle, WA
Colorado Springs, CO
The actual visual of the RF mapping makes better sense than the plots on graphs.
This is a very important question.
Gilbert, Az