Environmental Impact Assessment for the Mai Po visitor centre 米埔遊客中心的環境影響評估
67 Comments
K
Kenny Yip
7 years ago
EIA please, I want to see birds, not a damn new bldg.
J
John Hammond
7 years ago
Practice what you preach please!
A
Andrew Hardacre
7 years ago
Please provide full disclosure and have an EIA done before making a final decision on the redevelopment project.
M
Martin Williams
7 years ago
Any reasons for plans apparently being kept quiet?
If not, seems reasonable to be open about them - indeed, a wwf hk letter says "wwf supports a transparent consultation"; surely this is Hong Kong's crown jewel for wildlife, only made possible thro support of HK people.
Also, the Peter Scott Centre is not ancient; it is sizeable by comparison with centres at many a reserve I believe. Could it be renovated, better used? [yes, too late now]
- and I never thought it was ideally planned in first place; but wonder if replacement will be so marvellous.
EIA please, I want to see birds, not a damn new bldg.
Practice what you preach please!
Please provide full disclosure and have an EIA done before making a final decision on the redevelopment project.
Any reasons for plans apparently being kept quiet? If not, seems reasonable to be open about them - indeed, a wwf hk letter says "wwf supports a transparent consultation"; surely this is Hong Kong's crown jewel for wildlife, only made possible thro support of HK people. Also, the Peter Scott Centre is not ancient; it is sizeable by comparison with centres at many a reserve I believe. Could it be renovated, better used? [yes, too late now] - and I never thought it was ideally planned in first place; but wonder if replacement will be so marvellous.
Please do the right thing
WWF should walk their talk.
An EIA is a basic requirement- why not do this?