Mill Quay Estate E14: Opposition to planned parking control & fines
9 Comments
C
Concerned Resident
6 years ago
The problem is that you are all blatantly ignoring the MQRA Deed of Transfer of Part, Third Schedule, 12 - which is the LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT that allows you to live at Mill Quay.
This clearly outlines what and where MQRA residents can park. and states:
For freeholders, private motor vehicles that are roadworthy and in regular use may only be parked in the garage or the driveway of the dwelling.
That answers Anne-Marie Hopcrofts's question regards - where are our visitors expected to park!!
If you allow them to park anywhere else you are in breach of your contract with MQRA.
MQRA residents have no contractual rights to park in any of the CDE or ABFG car parks - they do not contribute towards the upkeep of these areas - if they do park in them, then technically they are 'trespassing' on private land.
Why do none of you think you need to adhere to the terms of a legally binding contract?
C
Concerned
6 years ago
The parking problems and related ASB/crime/drugs crime is continuing unabated.
MQRA and residents continue to ignore the Rent Charge Deed and the Deed of transfer of part which are the legally binding contracts to allow us to reside at Mill Quay.
This amounts to breach of contract - the rules in respect of parking are clearly laid out here:
http://www.millquay.org/EstateRules.htm
I can't understand why everyone thinks they can just ignore the lawfully binding contracts
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Featured
No consultation ! Why was this not discussed at the annual residents meeting? I can't see what the parking issue is. The flat carparks are never full and the road is not obstructed.
S
Stanley Fung
9 years ago
Too complicated, too many restriction on flat tenants and landlords. A simple flat household parking permit with extra visitor permit will do the job. The purpose is to get rid of frequently offensive outsiders and not adding burden on flat residents.
M
Minh Tran
9 years ago
Totally against this proposal.
M
Matthew Hopcroft
9 years ago
Featured
The lack of genuine consultation is a joke, made worse by the claim that this has happened.
Freehold house residents need to be able to provide legitimate parking for visitors somehow - the rules as currently proposed offer no means of doing this.
A
Anne-Marie Hopcroft
9 years ago
I actually do not necessarily mind the implementation of a parking enforcement scheme but do not feel this is a fair system at all. Notwithstanding the lack of consultation, house owners will not be allowed to have a visitors pass so where are our visitors expected to park!!
D
David James
9 years ago
I oppose the introduction of planned parking control and fines. Residents should be consulted on this important matter.
The problem is that you are all blatantly ignoring the MQRA Deed of Transfer of Part, Third Schedule, 12 - which is the LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT that allows you to live at Mill Quay. This clearly outlines what and where MQRA residents can park. and states: For freeholders, private motor vehicles that are roadworthy and in regular use may only be parked in the garage or the driveway of the dwelling. That answers Anne-Marie Hopcrofts's question regards - where are our visitors expected to park!! If you allow them to park anywhere else you are in breach of your contract with MQRA. MQRA residents have no contractual rights to park in any of the CDE or ABFG car parks - they do not contribute towards the upkeep of these areas - if they do park in them, then technically they are 'trespassing' on private land. Why do none of you think you need to adhere to the terms of a legally binding contract?
The parking problems and related ASB/crime/drugs crime is continuing unabated. MQRA and residents continue to ignore the Rent Charge Deed and the Deed of transfer of part which are the legally binding contracts to allow us to reside at Mill Quay. This amounts to breach of contract - the rules in respect of parking are clearly laid out here: http://www.millquay.org/EstateRules.htm I can't understand why everyone thinks they can just ignore the lawfully binding contracts
No consultation ! Why was this not discussed at the annual residents meeting? I can't see what the parking issue is. The flat carparks are never full and the road is not obstructed.
Too complicated, too many restriction on flat tenants and landlords. A simple flat household parking permit with extra visitor permit will do the job. The purpose is to get rid of frequently offensive outsiders and not adding burden on flat residents.
Totally against this proposal.
The lack of genuine consultation is a joke, made worse by the claim that this has happened. Freehold house residents need to be able to provide legitimate parking for visitors somehow - the rules as currently proposed offer no means of doing this.
I actually do not necessarily mind the implementation of a parking enforcement scheme but do not feel this is a fair system at all. Notwithstanding the lack of consultation, house owners will not be allowed to have a visitors pass so where are our visitors expected to park!!
I oppose the introduction of planned parking control and fines. Residents should be consulted on this important matter.
Totally unnecessary, inconvenient and unsightly.