Skip to main content

An Open Letter Urging an Equitable and Representative Voting Structure for the proposed Cuyama Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency

38 Comments

J
Jon Jones
9 years ago

Land owner in Cottonwood Canyon. Cuyama Valley

J
John michael
9 years ago

Stop corporate greed, please. Be good humans.

A
Andrew Clinard
9 years ago Featured

Cannot let the largest historical abusers of groundwater regulate future groundwater use - there will be no more groundwater.

D
David Goller
9 years ago

Landowner and resident of Cottonwood Canyon, Cuyama Valley

W
Whitney Goller
9 years ago

Landowner and resident of Cottonwood Canyon, Cuyama Valley

R
Robert Ryan
9 years ago

Resident and land owner, Cottonwood Canyon, New Cuyama Santa Barbara Co. & San Luis Obispo County

S
sue krout
9 years ago

Land owner in Cottonwood Canyon, Cuyama Valley, CA. and resident in San Luis Obispo. CA.

E
Elizabeth Bertani
9 years ago Featured

It is imperative that residents of New Cuyama have representation in GSA via the Cuyama Community Services District (CCSD).

J
Janine Ariey
9 years ago

The GSA needs to protect the Cuyama Valley's water resources and the valley's long-term future on all levels, and it needs to represent equitably all water users. I support one vote per entity in the Cuyama Valley GSA. The large agricultural interests of the eastern Cuyama Valley that are represented by the Cuyama Water District should not be given the power to control the GSA with a disproportionately large voting block. Landowner, Cottonwood Canyon area, western Cuyama Valley, Santa Barbara County; resident of San Luis Obispo County.

P
Pamela Baczuk
9 years ago

Water is our most precious resource. The Cuyama Valley is dependent on conservation of its groundwater.

J
John Mackenzie
9 years ago Featured

It is critical to equitable water use and honest approach to sustainability for ALL stakeholders to be adequately represented in any GSA outcomes.

P
Philip Henry III
9 years ago

Each entity of the Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) should have one vote. The Cuyama Water District (Big Agriculture) should not have more votes (5 versus one each) than the other participants, especially since they are focused only on their commercial interests in the eastern side of the Cuyama Valley. The proposed lopsided representation will not reflect the differing needs, and will not protect the interests of the western portion of the Cuyama Valley (e.g. Cottonwood Canyon).

A
Alisha Taff
9 years ago

I want an equitable voting structure for the GSA in the Cuyama Valley. All voices need to be heard. I am resident of Santa Barbara County.

B
Barney Skelton
9 years ago

I want an equitable voting structure for the GSA in the Cuyama Valley. All voices need to be heard. I am resident of Highway 166, West Cuyama Valley, Santa Barbara County.

J
Jan Smith
9 years ago

Looks like there's a problem with the zip code translator. I don't live in Chula Vista.

J
Jan Smith
9 years ago

In order to bring our critically over drafted Cuyama Valley groundwater basin into sustainable usage, the voting membership of the GSA will be balancing ecological and quality of life issues over economic profit for an indefinite amount of time. I believe there will be a conflict of interests for the newly formed Cuyama Water District to have a majority vote on the GSA and I'm surprised and concerned that they proposed having 5 votes on the GSA. I live and work in the Ventura County portion (south of Ventucopa) of the Cuyama Valley.

S
Stephen R Gliessman
9 years ago

I want an equitable voting structure for the GSA in the Cuyama Valley. All voices need to be heard. I am resident of Cottonwood Canyon, Cuyama Valley, Santa Barbara County.

R
Roberta Jaffe
9 years ago

Strongly support equitable voting structure. Resident and landowner Cottonwood Canyon, Cuyama Valley, Santa Barbara County