Inconsiderate to impose limitations, the main thing to consider. Those who are struggling with 1 subject should be allowed to only sit for that paper. Not be barred. They are almost there deserve more chance than those who didn't get through the whole exam. Everyone should be allowed to sit for the exam at their own pace not force them to sit for it as now there is a limitation. Reconsider the rulings.
P
Palvin
7 years ago
Featured
Please consider especially the number of sittings (4) and candidates should be allowed to repeat subjects they have failed. It doesn't make sense for students to keep repeating papers they have passed. It serves no purpose and this also applies to those who are repeating one paper.
S
SIM MONG MIN
7 years ago
Featured
I am a CLP candidate. The board claims that anyone who failed 4 tries in clp is of low 'quality'. My argument is as long as the clp candidate can pass regardless of number of sitting he takes, he is said to have achieve the requirement and should not be differentiate with those who pass in a sitting. Passing in 1 sitting and passing in 7 sittings is still a pass, they are same.
J
Jack Loh
8 years ago
Please reconsider the old system.
S
Sri
8 years ago
Featured
From 2021, they want to implement that only students with 5credits in spm can sit for clp. Ridiculous for working adults who is sitting for jurisprudence degree in UM. Reason for that is to increase quality of lawyers. LOL. The most ridiculous reasoning.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Pls Reconsider CLP system.
N
Nur Ibadatul Alia
8 years ago
I highly supportall the reasonable and relevant points of request
J
Joyce Joseph
8 years ago
Abolish on the resit of papers which candidates have passed, only resit papers failed. Many give up being a lawyers because of this frustrating rules. Abolish on the limitation of resits.
C
Corrine James
8 years ago
I totally agree with the above. I pray hope that the Board will reconsider the conditions spelled out. Am looking forward to a positive review.
M
Maurisha jane
8 years ago
Please help bring change for the future of our education
M
Muhammad luqman bin anuar
8 years ago
I support for the rules to be amended
R
Ralph Pillai
8 years ago
reconsider the requirement of resits of papers which the candidates have passed and only to re-sit those failed. This would be in line with other entrance examinations conducted by other professional bodies in Malaysia.
to reconsider the limited tries imposed on candidates for resitting the examinations. Determination is a positive trait. If a candidate has the determination to succeed and not to give up, such an attitude ought to be lauded and not discouraged.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
I couldn't agree more! CLP being 100% exam based itself is already a torture for many students.
- a first year law student -
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Please allow all the relevant statutory books to be brought in clp examination hall.
L
Lawrence
8 years ago
Please consider!
C
CY Tang
8 years ago
For a better system
V
Vicknesh Gunasingam
8 years ago
Not only the country needs a reform..it's regulation should be transformed for one too
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Please do
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
I really hope this will be taken into consideration as I am about to start my CLP in a few months’ time.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
We need changes to keep abreast of new development. Fully support this. Statutes should be allowed.
Inconsiderate to impose limitations, the main thing to consider. Those who are struggling with 1 subject should be allowed to only sit for that paper. Not be barred. They are almost there deserve more chance than those who didn't get through the whole exam. Everyone should be allowed to sit for the exam at their own pace not force them to sit for it as now there is a limitation. Reconsider the rulings.
Please consider especially the number of sittings (4) and candidates should be allowed to repeat subjects they have failed. It doesn't make sense for students to keep repeating papers they have passed. It serves no purpose and this also applies to those who are repeating one paper.
I am a CLP candidate. The board claims that anyone who failed 4 tries in clp is of low 'quality'. My argument is as long as the clp candidate can pass regardless of number of sitting he takes, he is said to have achieve the requirement and should not be differentiate with those who pass in a sitting. Passing in 1 sitting and passing in 7 sittings is still a pass, they are same.
Please reconsider the old system.
From 2021, they want to implement that only students with 5credits in spm can sit for clp. Ridiculous for working adults who is sitting for jurisprudence degree in UM. Reason for that is to increase quality of lawyers. LOL. The most ridiculous reasoning.
Pls Reconsider CLP system.
I highly supportall the reasonable and relevant points of request
Abolish on the resit of papers which candidates have passed, only resit papers failed. Many give up being a lawyers because of this frustrating rules. Abolish on the limitation of resits.
I totally agree with the above. I pray hope that the Board will reconsider the conditions spelled out. Am looking forward to a positive review.
Please help bring change for the future of our education
I support for the rules to be amended
reconsider the requirement of resits of papers which the candidates have passed and only to re-sit those failed. This would be in line with other entrance examinations conducted by other professional bodies in Malaysia. to reconsider the limited tries imposed on candidates for resitting the examinations. Determination is a positive trait. If a candidate has the determination to succeed and not to give up, such an attitude ought to be lauded and not discouraged.
I couldn't agree more! CLP being 100% exam based itself is already a torture for many students. - a first year law student -
Please allow all the relevant statutory books to be brought in clp examination hall.
Please consider!
For a better system
Not only the country needs a reform..it's regulation should be transformed for one too
Please do
I really hope this will be taken into consideration as I am about to start my CLP in a few months’ time.
We need changes to keep abreast of new development. Fully support this. Statutes should be allowed.