Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.
Final supporters
By signing this petition, we the students in year 1 of the Master of Chiropractor program, collectively agree that the multiple choice section (section I) of the Clinical Physiology (CH1S04) module, was given at a level not equivalent to the level taught and given in the lectures throughout the year. We found that the questions were given at a level of detail that was far too difficult in comparison to the lectures given throughout the year.
More like this
This petitions is for concerned and affected Biol343 students with regards to…
PY349 summer exam June 2014 unfair questioning and marking allocations
Updates
May 26, 2015
Reaching this level of support is heavy because it confirms what we all felt in that room. The exhaustion of this module is taking its toll but seeing your names here keeps me pushing forward.
11 Comments
The multiple choice questions had nothing to do with the lectures. Even if someone knew the whole Guyton it was impossible to answer these questions. The essays were not too difficult though. I don't know what's going on with this uni but after physiology and chiropractic I am thinking of going back to Aecc
Far too difficult, the exam questioning was way beyond the level that we were taught. Mislead by the tutor considering he had pointed out on numerous occasions that the exam for clinical physiology, would not go into a great amount of detail, and was more an overview to show understanding with the topics.
The MCQ where way to detailed. and in the smallest detail. Some few few question where possible to answer, but most question went to far in depth , compared what we went throug in class!
The MCQ part of this exam was not Clinical Physiology and for most of the part it was not the stuff that we have gone through this year. Way to detailed for what we have been thought in 1 year.
my main problem that we are taught by a lecturer who does not believe that I'm the chiropractic profession and he was very quick to let us know, Also the multiple choice questions were not the level which was in the lecture slides and teaching seminars
Feel that some questions were out of lecture syllabus, even with further reading proved difficult.
Not enough guidence for chiro 1 exam, we should have been told which articles to read specifically. The past papers need mark schemes. NRA should be a 2 hour exam.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.
Final supporters
By signing this petition, we the students in year 1 of the Master of Chiropractor program, collectively agree that the multiple choice section (section I) of the Clinical Physiology (CH1S04) module, was given at a level not equivalent to the level taught and given in the lectures throughout the year. We found that the questions were given at a level of detail that was far too difficult in comparison to the lectures given throughout the year.
Updates
May 26, 2015
Reaching this level of support is heavy because it confirms what we all felt in that room. The exhaustion of this module is taking its toll but seeing your names here keeps me pushing forward.
11 Comments
I know this is UNI and that we have to do some research by ourselves but we weren't given any tools for this and I personally couldn't find more information that was on our lecture sides from the physiology books
The multiple choice questions had nothing to do with the lectures. Even if someone knew the whole Guyton it was impossible to answer these questions. The essays were not too difficult though. I don't know what's going on with this uni but after physiology and chiropractic I am thinking of going back to Aecc
Far too difficult, the exam questioning was way beyond the level that we were taught. Mislead by the tutor considering he had pointed out on numerous occasions that the exam for clinical physiology, would not go into a great amount of detail, and was more an overview to show understanding with the topics.
The MCQ where way to detailed. and in the smallest detail. Some few few question where possible to answer, but most question went to far in depth , compared what we went throug in class!
The MCQ part of this exam was not Clinical Physiology and for most of the part it was not the stuff that we have gone through this year. Way to detailed for what we have been thought in 1 year.
my main problem that we are taught by a lecturer who does not believe that I'm the chiropractic profession and he was very quick to let us know, Also the multiple choice questions were not the level which was in the lecture slides and teaching seminars
Feel that some questions were out of lecture syllabus, even with further reading proved difficult.
Not enough guidence for chiro 1 exam, we should have been told which articles to read specifically. The past papers need mark schemes. NRA should be a 2 hour exam.
More like this
This petitions is for concerned and affected Biol343 students with regards to…
PY349 summer exam June 2014 unfair questioning and marking allocations
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
I know this is UNI and that we have to do some research by ourselves but we weren't given any tools for this and I personally couldn't find more information that was on our lecture sides from the physiology books