Skip to main content

Opposition to 45 Worthington Street, Mission Hill

104 Comments

C
Claire Harris
4 years ago

37 Calumet st

J
Judith Paradis
6 years ago

Menacing the Triangular Conservation District

D
Danny Gessner
10 years ago

No need for a skyscraper to pack in more yuppies, plenty of affordable living in neighborhood

V
Vanessa Nason
10 years ago

This project is completely wrong for the Mission Hill area. It takes away from the history and would disrupt the unique personality of the neighborhood. It would lead to further developments most likely, displacing many of the people that live here and have lived here for years.

E
Ellen Leonard
10 years ago

To tall. Will create obstructive view,traffic.,etc,ect

G
Greg Richardson
10 years ago

Nice idea, wrong place! This part of mission hill is not equipped for such a large building. Keep the charm and character of this neighborhood intact and build this tower somewhere else!!!

N
Nathan Beaudreau
10 years ago

783 E4th St

D
Deirdre Eldridge
10 years ago

I love Mission Hill. This building is completely wrong for our neighborhood. The scale of this building would be an eyesore around the historic area brownstones,.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

WAY TOO BIG!

C
Christophe Otter
10 years ago

So, the parking lot is better? I think this a great project. Housing is needed and the only way to go is up.

M
MALEK AL-KHATIB
10 years ago

This area is historic and should be protected.

Q
Q. Regestein
10 years ago

The picture at www.nomissionhilltower shows that Mission Hill liviability would be lost

R
Romella Tucker
11 years ago

235 Pond St. #120

R
Roxanne Haecker
11 years ago

Out of scale for the neighborhhod, overburdens an already heavily congested traffic pattern, just too much for the location

M
Maynard Clark
11 years ago

650 Huntington Avenue, 11J

D
Diane Brown
11 years ago

I am opposed to the 45 Worthington Street Project.

L
Laura L. Montgomery
11 years ago Featured

NO! A tower is not consistent with the neighborhood the project attempts to situate itself within. A lovely brick front historic district should be kept that way, charming, on a human scale, not perverted by highrise towers and out of town developers who want to create income generating residential towers in an already too dense neighborhood.

A
Anne Sasser
11 years ago

I am totally against this huge tower being built in the historic triangle. It is non-conforming to the surrounding buildings around it.

C
Carmen Pola
11 years ago

We at Mission Hill are in agreement that we do not need or desire such a montrosity builduing here in our neighborhood

J
John Hauck
11 years ago

This building is appropriate for downtown Boston - not Mission Hill!