Skip to main content

26 & 30 Milbrook Road - Petition to the Medfield Conservation Commission

15 Comments

T
TIm Hughes
5 years ago Featured

I've lived on Millbrook Rd. for over 35 years, and this is a spot I walk by every day. Putting up a house on this property would dramatically change the neighborhood - and not for the better. I feel like the owner is trying to shoehorn a house into these lots for one purpose - money. Please don't ruin this unique wetland area. I can almost hear the wildlife calling out "Don't build on me!"

C
Christine McCue Potts
5 years ago Featured

Before our former Conservation Commission agent departed, she made a point of saying that the 100' buffer zone should never be breached. If this is what will happen with the proposed construction, our Conservation Commission should automatically deny the permit. Why are we as a town buying or accepting donations of land for conservation purposes only to turn around and approve non-conforming construction in the same area? The entire Mill Brook area needs protection, not destruction.

D
Dean Steeger
5 years ago

6 Country Way

K
Kathleen Jordan
5 years ago Featured

Opposed to this project which is on land has been taxed and assessed as non buildable since the developer has owned it.

E
Elizabeth Abramson
5 years ago

Please preserve the wetlands-it is important for the neighborhood

E
Ellen Redfield
5 years ago Featured

Do not build on the beautiful wetland. It is wrong to destroy habitat and plant growth for the benefit of one person and the detriment of many including wildlife and wild flowers.

J
Jeff Hyman
5 years ago

Wetlands must be preserved! Keep open space open!

E
Eileen Murphy
5 years ago

Protect the wetlands and the charming neighborhood.

A
Allison Buff
5 years ago

Let’s conserve as much of the land as we can

F
Frank DeHoff
5 years ago Featured

I agree with all the other commenters. I also feel it is a betrayal of the Board to approve exceptions which impact current owners of property in the area. Making exceptions for a lot that wasn't qualified to have a structure built just to benefit one while detracting from the rest is wrong. By-laws and code may have changed for the lot in question, but the owner, at that time, had fair notice to take action before the laws took effect, or to sell the property. Changing the rules now to accommodate for the owner's inaction years ago should not be a burden placed on everyone else today.

C
Craig Yancich
5 years ago

Opposed to construction on what has been considered wetlands since building guide lines were created

K
Katherine Stromland
5 years ago Featured

This project would be a real detriment to the environment, with many native plants and animals affected. A house on that section of scenic road would be a blight. Please do not allow this project to go forward. I would be in favor of town buying for wetlands conservation purposes.

K
Kristina Bunce
5 years ago

I am opposed to the proposed project at 26/30 Millbrook Rd. Thank you.

J
Jill Newberg
5 years ago

please do not build on these valuable natural habitats!

A
Andrea Balsamo
5 years ago

It would be a tragedy to build in this beautiful spot