Save the Trees and Clean Air on the California Coastal Trail
78 Comments
S
Sterling Ferguson
2 months ago
What a waste money that’s going to ungonhgt
C
Charles Thornton
2 months ago
As a homeowner, I am concrned about increased noise and polution. It makes no sense to locate a siding in a tree lined residential area.
J
Jackie Walters
2 months ago
This is way too impactful on the residents, environment, trees & habitats, an alternate location needs to be identified!
D
Devin Howes Starratt
2 months ago
I still have vivid memories as a small child driving through the trees to visit my grandparents. Our children now have the same memories when we visit our friends. Memories are important but the trees even more so. Keep the charm of Padaro and keep the wildlife that call those trees home.
J
Julia Corso
2 months ago
Environmental protection
B
Barry Schwartz
2 months ago
This will ruin the lane
B
Brian Edwards
2 months ago
I walk along Padaro Lane almost every day. The idea of all the trees that will have to be removed will impact the iconic feel of this area forever. I cannot imagine an idling diesel train next to the road, in place of the trees. Please rethink this!
F
Frances Baker
2 months ago
The trees are an integral part of the beauty of this area.
S
Supporter
2 months ago
Save the trees on Padaro Lane! We do not want the siding!
S
Supporter
2 months ago
Stop the siding
C
Carolyn Callahan
2 months ago
Please save beautiful Padaro Lane's fauna and flora by stopping the Ortega Siding Project.
E
Elizabeth Van Eyck
2 months ago
It would be a terrible thing to tear down all those trees. I do not want to see the face Padaro lane changed so drastically.
M
Michael Wehrle
2 months ago
I own 3493 Padaro Lane. The reason I purchased the property was due to the peaceful nature of the property as well as the local habitat. I frequently bike the area and see not only my fellow homeowners, but the community at large enjoying the area.
To destroy the habitat to build a siding for a railroad system that is rarely used, seems counter intuitive.
Therefore, I vote to save the environment and habitat.
S
Sylvia Cattani
2 months ago
I want to save the trees and wildlife along our beautiful coast.
K
Kent Allebrand
2 months ago
Save the trees
J
Jeana Trout
2 months ago
I'm a manager of Guston's Properties, LLC located at 3493 Padaro Lane. That beach is a slice of heaven with the natural habitats and peacefulness that not only homeowners but the general public enjoy.
We are already fighting the smells associated with the cannabis grow fields.
Please save our slice of heaven on earth.
D
David Nimmer
2 months ago
Trees are vital to our neighborhood and the larger environment.
D
David Gibbs
2 months ago
These objections are important. But additionally the County & RR project will not solve their stated problem. The new freeway largely solves it. Many previous attempts to get commuters to ride trains to SB have failed. Many free tickets failed. Working men & women need their vehicles to carry materials to sites. CCSB & UCSB & government employees could, but dont use. Why not try various size buses with multiple stops using high speed lane?
T
Tom Marble
2 months ago
Padaro Lane should not be compromised due to a misguided expansion of an under-used train route.
E
Edward Engs
2 months ago
For the health safety and welfare of our community.
What a waste money that’s going to ungonhgt
As a homeowner, I am concrned about increased noise and polution. It makes no sense to locate a siding in a tree lined residential area.
This is way too impactful on the residents, environment, trees & habitats, an alternate location needs to be identified!
I still have vivid memories as a small child driving through the trees to visit my grandparents. Our children now have the same memories when we visit our friends. Memories are important but the trees even more so. Keep the charm of Padaro and keep the wildlife that call those trees home.
Environmental protection
This will ruin the lane
I walk along Padaro Lane almost every day. The idea of all the trees that will have to be removed will impact the iconic feel of this area forever. I cannot imagine an idling diesel train next to the road, in place of the trees. Please rethink this!
The trees are an integral part of the beauty of this area.
Save the trees on Padaro Lane! We do not want the siding!
Stop the siding
Please save beautiful Padaro Lane's fauna and flora by stopping the Ortega Siding Project.
It would be a terrible thing to tear down all those trees. I do not want to see the face Padaro lane changed so drastically.
I own 3493 Padaro Lane. The reason I purchased the property was due to the peaceful nature of the property as well as the local habitat. I frequently bike the area and see not only my fellow homeowners, but the community at large enjoying the area. To destroy the habitat to build a siding for a railroad system that is rarely used, seems counter intuitive. Therefore, I vote to save the environment and habitat.
I want to save the trees and wildlife along our beautiful coast.
Save the trees
I'm a manager of Guston's Properties, LLC located at 3493 Padaro Lane. That beach is a slice of heaven with the natural habitats and peacefulness that not only homeowners but the general public enjoy. We are already fighting the smells associated with the cannabis grow fields. Please save our slice of heaven on earth.
Trees are vital to our neighborhood and the larger environment.
These objections are important. But additionally the County & RR project will not solve their stated problem. The new freeway largely solves it. Many previous attempts to get commuters to ride trains to SB have failed. Many free tickets failed. Working men & women need their vehicles to carry materials to sites. CCSB & UCSB & government employees could, but dont use. Why not try various size buses with multiple stops using high speed lane?
Padaro Lane should not be compromised due to a misguided expansion of an under-used train route.
For the health safety and welfare of our community.