Privacy infringement, and unjust use of surveillance have cause may innocent people to be suspended of crime and arrested unjustly.
S
Steven Crane
1 month ago
Unconstitutional
E
Elton Gove
1 month ago
The city needs to provide notice of cancelation within 30days of renewal or they are locked into a 36month term. They signed it 11/10/25 . There is one meeting left. This is the least painful opportunity for the commission to do something over the next 3 years. Save $$$ and potentially give that money back into direct policing in our community. Do not miss the first October meeting.
R
Rex Winz
1 month ago
The fact that any data collected by Flock is avaliable without any guardrails is frightening.
F
Francis Abrams
1 month ago
I don’t need my wife being tracked every where she goes.
T
Traci Scott
1 month ago
Where I go and what I do is my business.
J
John Scott
1 month ago
This is big brother watching. It is illegal.
K
Krista Czaplinski
1 month ago
Privacy right issue
C
Colby Czaplinski
1 month ago
It's an invasion of privacy not just for me but my family
R
Ricky Meyers
1 month ago
Because these cameras aren't to protect!! They are made to watch every little thing we do in our town!! They are corrupt down to the bone!!!
D
David Nicely
1 month ago
Invasion of privacy
R
Richard Crane
1 month ago
Not constitutional!
S
Shawn Dinneen
1 month ago
Mass surveillance is unacceptable. The future of our society cannot be maintained if this is allowed. We might as well just say we are moving into a dictatorship with no freedom to choose for ourselves.
J
John Donaldson
1 month ago
These cameras are a violation of constitutional rights. If the government needs them, that should have been brought for a vote
M
Marlene Noriega
1 month ago
Invasion of our privacy !
S
Steve-deb Dowler
1 month ago
Featured
We have a camera in the Geuda bridge. Invasion of privacy, I don't need watched.
J
Jack Bowling
1 month ago
Breach of privacy
J
Jeffery Trenary
1 month ago
Over reach
T
Tzar Bowlby
1 month ago
Featured
They create a permanent comprehensive log of a persons movement over time violating the fourth amendment and have been used as probable cause for crimes that have no victim. Edward Abram’s-Philips case. There has also been countless cases of domestic abuse and romantic stalking by law enforcement officers. It is not being used for violent crime. The creators of Flock don’t want Flock cameras in their neighborhoods and neither should you. Do not sell out to these tech oligarchs.
S
Sierra Bowlby
1 month ago
I believe that the flock cameras are an invasion of my civil rights as an American citizen.
Privacy infringement, and unjust use of surveillance have cause may innocent people to be suspended of crime and arrested unjustly.
Unconstitutional
The city needs to provide notice of cancelation within 30days of renewal or they are locked into a 36month term. They signed it 11/10/25 . There is one meeting left. This is the least painful opportunity for the commission to do something over the next 3 years. Save $$$ and potentially give that money back into direct policing in our community. Do not miss the first October meeting.
The fact that any data collected by Flock is avaliable without any guardrails is frightening.
I don’t need my wife being tracked every where she goes.
Where I go and what I do is my business.
This is big brother watching. It is illegal.
Privacy right issue
It's an invasion of privacy not just for me but my family
Because these cameras aren't to protect!! They are made to watch every little thing we do in our town!! They are corrupt down to the bone!!!
Invasion of privacy
Not constitutional!
Mass surveillance is unacceptable. The future of our society cannot be maintained if this is allowed. We might as well just say we are moving into a dictatorship with no freedom to choose for ourselves.
These cameras are a violation of constitutional rights. If the government needs them, that should have been brought for a vote
Invasion of our privacy !
We have a camera in the Geuda bridge. Invasion of privacy, I don't need watched.
Breach of privacy
Over reach
They create a permanent comprehensive log of a persons movement over time violating the fourth amendment and have been used as probable cause for crimes that have no victim. Edward Abram’s-Philips case. There has also been countless cases of domestic abuse and romantic stalking by law enforcement officers. It is not being used for violent crime. The creators of Flock don’t want Flock cameras in their neighborhoods and neither should you. Do not sell out to these tech oligarchs.
I believe that the flock cameras are an invasion of my civil rights as an American citizen.