To the Palmon Survival Development Team

We, the undersigned members of the Palmon Survival community, are asking for an immediate review of the current server migration and balancing system.

Our concern is not that powerful players exist, nor is it that players continue to spend and increase their strength.

The concern is that the current migration system is not providing weaker servers with a realistic opportunity to reinforce themselves and remain competitive as power continues to concentrate elsewhere.

Migration should help maintain competitive balance between servers. Instead, some servers continue to grow significantly stronger while competing servers are left with no meaningful way to close the gap.

That creates a situation where the issue is no longer simply who played better, spent more, or progressed faster. The problem becomes whether the game's own balancing mechanics are giving other servers any realistic opportunity to respond.

Migration Can Be the Solution

We believe migration can absolutely work if it is implemented properly.

When a major competitive imbalance develops, migration should provide disadvantaged servers with meaningful opportunities to recruit enough strength to challenge that imbalance.

The goal should not be to make every server equal or guarantee anyone a victory.

The goal should be to ensure there is still a realistic path to compete.

Server strength also continues to change after migration. Powerful accounts keep progressing, spending, and strengthening other accounts. If one server continues compounding its advantage while competing servers receive no comparable reinforcement opportunities, the gap only becomes larger.

Migration needs to respond to that changing reality.

What We Are Asking For

We respectfully ask the development team to review:

1. Overall server strength, including how servers compare with those they regularly compete against.
2. Concentration of top-end power, rather than relying only on total server strength.
3. Meaningful reinforcement opportunities for weaker servers when major competitive disparities exist.
4. Dynamic migration limits and eligibility that adjust as server strength changes.
5. Protections against continually concentrating additional power onto already-dominant servers.
6. Transparent balancing criteria so players understand how migration opportunities are determined.
7. Server merges or other balancing measures when migration alone can no longer reasonably correct the problem.

What This Petition Is Really Asking For

We are not asking Palmon Survival to punish strong players or restrict legitimate spending.

We are asking for the migration system to account for the competitive environment that continued growth creates.

There is a difference between losing because another server performed better and losing because the power disparity has become so extreme that the game's own migration system provides no realistic way to respond.

We are not asking for equal servers. We are asking for every server to have a legitimate opportunity to compete.

Many of us have invested significant time, money, and effort into Palmon Survival and want to continue doing so. But long-term competition cannot remain healthy if some servers continue growing stronger while others are given no meaningful mechanism to reinforce themselves.

We respectfully ask that this petition be escalated to the development team responsible for server balance, migration policy, cross-server competition, and long-term game health.

Migration should help correct competitive imbalance—not allow it to continually grow.