Skip to main content

LINCOLN COUNTY MISSOURI RESIDENTS' PETITION FOR A MORATORIUM

313 Comments

N
Norma Rogers Verified
1 month ago

Wildlife and natural beauty. I live in the country and want to keep it that way.

B
Billy Hinkle Verified
1 month ago

We don't need this facility in the country on farm ground that is producing

T
Tanya Wieman Verified
1 month ago

I was our property to stay rural

D
Denise Marshall Verified
1 month ago

I believe Lincoln County has very fertile soil and it should remain Agricultural. I also believe the technology poses an environmental risk to our community.

K
Kim Shocklee Verified
1 month ago

So many reasons NOT to allow this! Questionable NDAs, no true assurances from Ameren on benefits vs. rewards for our county and especially those landowners most impacted. Now we have to convince, even beg, our local commissioners to pass a moratorium for more research?? Last, this Ameren case lumps us with proposed projects on industrialized sites on other counties. This puts us at a huge disadvantage since we have so much more to lose in the way of our prime farmland and natural habitats.

J
Jesse Damke Verified
1 month ago

Put solar farms and battery storage and data centers on land that is unusable for living and farming. Like in Denmark.

C
Carma Klenke Verified
1 month ago

We need our farm land

J
Jesse Donaldson Verified
1 month ago

I moved to the country for it to remain that way. Not so city slickers could screw it up.

C
Cara Strecky Verified
1 month ago

Because I like the natural farm land, we didn’t move here to be surrounded by solar panels or eventually AI buildings.

A
Adrienne Wallace Verified
1 month ago

I moved here and loved the natural beauty and wildlife here. Data centers, solar farms, and other related projects have opportunities to pollute and tax not only residential our water and land, but we don't know the long term impact of these ventures. What will be left for future generations?

J
Jordyn Bange Verified
1 month ago

Keep our land pure!

J
Justine Dixon Verified
1 month ago

Our land is to beautiful, precious and important to ruin with unnecessary structures.

T
T Kovarik Verified
1 month ago

I oppose AE-2026-0183 because the proposed solar farm and battery storage facility could cause irreversible harm to human health, wildlife, endangered species, and our land and water. With inadequate testing, secrecy and unanswered safety concerns, this project should not move forward until these risks are fully investigated and addressed.

A
Amy Detmer Verified
1 month ago

Please put a stop to them taking our heritage for the future generations.

K
Kevin Barton Verified
1 month ago

No data, solar and battery farms in our county

J
Josh Sieker Verified
1 month ago

No!!

K
Katelyn Sprock Verified
1 month ago

We all need to slow down and enjoy life. Not add to the chaos it already is.

J
Jason Brown Verified
1 month ago

My children and my children's children

D
Delena Ballard Verified
1 month ago

A moratorium is important because our friends and neighbors will live with the consequences. This rural area is homes, farms, a church, and a cemetery, not an industrial park. Battery fires are hard to fight and can release toxic smoke; our local fire departments are not built for that. Farmland, peace and quiet, and property values would take the hit while the benefits go elsewhere. It's difficult to watch a corporation benefit from ruining a rural community.

L
LeAnne Freeman Verified
1 month ago

This is not safe for our community!