Skip to main content
Oppose the Destruction of an Ann Arbor Urban Forest

Oppose the Destruction of an Ann Arbor Urban Forest

636 signatures 114 to reach 750
S
Stefanie W. signed 13 days ago
B
Barbara Monahan B. signed
S
Sue L. signed
P
Phil L. signed
G
Geraldine M. signed
B
Brett D. signed
K
Kim W. signed
A
Achilleas A. signed
L
Lucas W. signed
L
Laura Z. signed
NA
Started by N Avra 4 months, 2 weeks ago
Decision Makers: Ann Arbor City Council

We oppose the destruction of the 3420 Glazier Way urban forest and urge the Ann Arbor City Council and the Ann Arbor Planning Commission to reject the proposed annexation, rezoning, and site plan for the Glazier Heights townhome project.

At 3420 Glazier Way in northeast Ann Arbor, the proposed 76-unit Glazier Heights development could clear-cut over 450 trees across an 8-acre wooded site. We understand that Ann Arbor needs housing, but not at the cost of wiping out a mature urban forest that already does so much for the community.  This project does little to save any trees and should be stopped or greatly reduced to benefit the people of the City of Ann Arbor.

This forest is not empty land. It is a dense, established tree canopy that helps absorb stormwater, cool the neighborhood, and support wildlife habitat. Once it is gone, it cannot be quickly replaced. The loss would permanently weaken the natural buffer that protects nearby homes and streets, and it would add to the urban heat island effect at a time when Ann Arbor should be protecting every tree it can.

The site is also directly south of the Glazier Hill Nature Area, making it part of a larger natural landscape that deserves care, not removal. Replacing this wooded area with high-density R4E development would be out of character with the surrounding residential area and would break up the green space that gives this part of Ann Arbor its identity.

We ask our city leaders to choose a better path: protect the 3420 Glazier Way urban forest, respect the Glazier Hill Nature Area, and plan for growth without sacrificing one of the city’s most valuable natural assets.

Updates

Reached 500 supporters

August 22, 2026

Reached 250 supporters

August 10, 2026

Reached 100 supporters

July 3, 2026

234 Comments

M
Melanie Snook Verified
4 months ago Featured

The proposed density is completely inappropriate for this area. The traffic impact this would have is extremely dangerous at an intersection that has already had many accidents and one related death. The loss of this forest would be terrific for the ecosystem.

J
Jon Bowdler Verified
4 months ago Featured

In addition to the documented destruction of natural features, the proposed density is completely inappropriate for the area. Also, the proposed entrance to the project from Glazier Way would create an extreme public safety hazard.

B
Boris Nadgorny Verified
4 months ago Featured

The proposed removal of 25 landmark trees is inconsistent with Ann Arbor’s A²ZERO climate goals. Mature trees provide carbon storage, cooling, stormwater absorption, habitat, and air-quality benefits that young saplings cannot replace for decades.

O
Olga Nadgorny Verified
4 months ago Featured

Please do not destroy this forest. This vibrant ecosystem is a vital sanctuary for countless wildlife species that cannot survive without it. Bulldozing these trees will directly destroy nesting birds, crush local habitats, and force animals into surrounding areas where they will likely perish.Our community needs to protect its remaining natural green spaces, not replace them with concrete. Once this biodiversity is gone, we can never get it back. Please choose conservation over development and

D
Dana Muir Verified
4 months ago Featured

This development's destruction of the forest canopy is incompatible with Ann Arbor's dedication to being "Tree Town," and the environmental benefits of the forest.

B
Barbara Monahan 730 Barclay Court Verified
27 days ago

Destruction of natural forest habitat. Significant increase in traffic on an increasingly busy Glazier Way. Absurd density. Demonstrates the greed of the developer.

G
Geraldine Markel Verified
1 month ago

Environmental concerns

K
Kim Allen Winick Verified
1 month ago

To protect natural features.

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 750 signatures.

Your share link

Share directly