It is evident that President Jacob Zuma unduly benefited from Public finance (ie Our Money). Members of his cabinet claim that Zuma was not aware of what was happening in his property when construction was in process until structures were complete. Now they point fingers to certain people whom they say they have to be held responsible, excluding the main man,the president.Do you mean construction of that nature, may start and get finished without the owner of the property's consent? or are we being taken for a ride here.Now the Public Protector has executed her duties pertaining to this matter and established that, indeed the president and his family has benefited unduly from this project. The focus now has drifted away from the actual "wrong doing" and the interest is in the report and hammering of an honest Public Protector. Now lets approach this in terms of "layman's set of mind", in that we accept that Zuma was not aware that State's money was being planted in his private property,now he knows, then let him pay it back [because that's his property] or let the property be transferred to the state. If you move with the fact that Zuma must either pay our money back or surrender the Nkandla property to the State, then please sign this petition and tell others who are negatively affected by this, to follow the suit.