Signatures 575 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, ... 12 › »
-
301
Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
302
Name: Felicity Walker on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
303
Name: Ari Berman on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
304
Name: A.J. Luxton on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
305
Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
306
Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008Comments: Dr. Zucker has no place in a modern academic discussion on transgender individuals.Flag
-
307
Name: Lucy Assad on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
308
Name: Laura on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
309
Name: Stephanie Bouley on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
310
Name: Dylan Ritchey on Aug 15, 2008Comments: Please realize the great harm that Dr. Zucker has done to our community both ethically and medically. It will take future medical professionals decades to undue his harmful practices, policies and to revise the DSM.Flag
-
311
Name: J.r. Williams on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
312
Name: Rebecca on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
313
Name: Rhiannon on Aug 15, 2008Comments: Zucker is not a freind of trans people, nor is he a freind of cross gendered children, or non sterotypically gendered children, he hurts those he claims to help.Flag
-
314
Name: Kimber Gunn on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
315
Name: Esther on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
316
Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
317
Name: Kelli Busey on Aug 15, 2008Comments: Kenneth Zukers methodology contributes to depression and suicide. Do not allow him to harm the youth of he world.Flag
-
318
Name: Stephanie Grant on Aug 15, 2008Comments: The Royal Society of Medicine usually holds itself to a high standard, and I am shocked to find that the Society would invite someone who is not just outdated but actively biased and harmful.Flag
-
319
Name: Julia Blayse on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
320
Name: Sophia Reid on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
321
Name: M. C. Brennan on Aug 15, 2008Comments: Virtually any random individual off the street would be a better, more knowledgeable, less corrosive and noxious choice for your panel. Dr. Zucker remains wholly ignorant of the last 25 years of research and thinking on gender identity issues and has repeatedly demonstrated and reinforced practices that cause permanent, lifelong harm to trans children. Inviting Dr. Zucker to a conference on adolescent GID is like inviting Colonel Sanders to a conference on the welfare of chickens. Please reconsider.Flag
-
322
Name: Sarah Brown on Aug 15, 2008Comments: That, in 2008, the UK medical community can invite a man who regards psychologically abusing Children to attempt to erase part of their developing personality as a valid form of medical intervention, to give a keynote speech at the Royal Society of Medicine is utterly shameful.Flag
-
323
Name: Grace Anderson on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
324
Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
325
Name: Kristopher on Aug 15, 2008Comments: Zucker is horrible; his tactics to force children to stop being queer, trans*, and/or gender variant are wrong. I would not be surprised if most of his victims go on to be very depressed and/or commit suicide. He is not a real scientist and should be removed from all positions of importance.Flag
-
326
Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
327
Name: Jack Cyrus on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
328
Name: S-J Smith on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
329
Name: Gareth Lee on Aug 15, 2008Comments: Dr Kenneth Zucker's theories on transgenderism should not be give a platform as they are damaging.Flag
-
330
Name: Oliver Franks-Pedrick on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
331
Name: Etain O'Kane on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
332
Name: Roz Kaveney on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
333
Name: Monika Dryburgh on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
334
Name: Leah Peters on Aug 15, 2008Comments: Dr Zucker's methods are not based on science, but on a judgemental bias. He considers anyone that expresses gender variant behavior or is transsexual to be a "bad outcome". How can a naturally occuring birth condition be considered a "bad outcome" Further, he practices reparative therapy on those two patient groups. He does this NOT for the benefit of the patient, but in a misguided effort to make everyone fit into his definition of the gender binary; one that's based on sex as assigned at birth. He totally disregards the patient's actual gender identity! The solution isn't placating parents and society, and punishing people born gender variant or transsexual, but in educating the general public about the natural diversity that occurs in species.Flag
-
335
Name: Jesse Kuiken on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
336
Name: Jesse Kuiken on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
337
Name: Emma Smith on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
338
Name: Diane Barnes on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
339
Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
340
Name: Leslie Sherlock on Aug 15, 2008Comments: I oppose Dr. Zucker's adherence to and insistence upon unrealistic, rigid gender role and sexuality stereotypes being enforced, particularly on such a vulnerable group of young transgender people.Flag
-
341
Name: Marlene Bomer on Aug 15, 2008Comments: This is equal to allowing Joseph Nicolosi to speak to mainstream psychological groups! This man is a quack and a fraud, and his actions harm thousands of children, thus ruining them forever!Flag
-
342
Name: Jolie McKenna on Aug 15, 2008Comments: Zucker's spreading of falsehoods and lies will not erase the solid reality of my existence as a successful and progressive transwoman.Flag
-
343
Name: Cameron Venier on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
344
Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
345
Name: Debi Crow on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
346
Name: Eva Hayward on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
347
Name: Dan K on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
348
Name: Harjant Gill on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
349
Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
350
Name: Ryan Heman on Aug 15, 2008Comments:Flag