Withdraw the NHS leaflet
Dear Mr David Cameron MP and Mr Andrew Lansley MP,
I
am writing to you regarding the recently published leaflet Working
Together for a Stronger NHS. I would like to contest a number of the
statements made within the leaflet, and based on a number of untruths
feel the leaflet should be immediately retracted.
Firstly, the leaflet states “Every year we could save 750 lives from heart disease... and there is no good reason for Britain to lag behind” (1). Despite
searching the Hansard, Pubmed and asking the Department of Health and
NHS Future Forum (who made the leaflet) I cannot find a source for this
claim. I contest that the UK is not lagging behind in the case of heart
disease. The data from the last thirty years shows that the death rates
from heart attacks in the UK have fallen more than in any other European
country (2). Indeed, if current trends continue death rates from heart
attacks will be lower than that of France (to which the UK is often
compared) by 2012 (2). This is not ‘lagging behind’ by any stretch of
the imagination.
Secondly, the leaflet states “Every year we could save... 5000 lives from cancer”(1). This
figure is from the series of EUROCARE studies. These studies looked at
data from 1985 – 1999, however one year later the massive NHS Cancer
Plan 2000 was rolled out and services changed significantly. The data
from EUROCARE therefore is not relevant to the debate on current
services since they have changed since the study finished. There were
also serious methodological issues with the study; many countries
submitted less than a quarter of all their cancer deaths to the
registry, whereas the UK submitted 100%, and important differences in
death certification make drawing meaningful comparisons challenging. In
any case, the conclusion of the EUROCARE is that the Britain in 1999 was
making “steady progress”(3) in cancer related mortality. Of course
there are always improvements to be made, but death rates from lung
cancer and breast cancer, two of the biggest killers, are falling at a
good rate (2), the NHS is not lagging behind in cancer care.
Finally, your leaflet states “95% want more choice over their healthcare"(1).
This is cited as the British Social Attitudes Survey, however the
survey asked no such question. It asked “how much choice do you think
NHS patients should have?”. The survey you cited in does not back up
your claim that “more choice” is wanted. In fact the survey shows that
64% of Britons are “quite satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the NHS -
the highest rate of satisfaction since the survey began nearly thirty
years ago (5).
I
request that you retract the leaflet on the grounds that the above
claims are made inappropriately. We need informed debate on this issue,
not propaganda based on old data and half truths.
Yours sincerely,
Erica Pool
1.
HM Government. 2011. Working together for a stronger NHS.
http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_125848
2. Appleby. 2011. Does poor health justify NHS reform? http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.d566.long
3.
Abdel-Rahman et al. 2009. What if cancer survival in Britain were the
same as in Europe: how many deaths are avoidable?
http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v101/n2s/full/6605401a.html
4.
Goldacre. 2011. I’d expect this from UKIP, or the Daily Mail. Not from a
government leaflet.
http://www.badscience.net/2011/04/id-expect-this-from-ukip-or-the-daily-mail-not-from-a-government-leaflet/
5.
Appleby. 2011. How satisfied are we with the NHS?
http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.d1836.full?sid=7f1fb4c7-234f-4e8e-bd3f-4e588088362a
Comment