Signatures 80 total
Page: 1, 2
-
1
Name: Betty L. Brodersen on Mar 28, 2010Comments: Glad to hear I am not the only one upset about the stupid new parking rules. I don't have paypalFlag
-
2
Name: Jason H. Harklerode on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Kevin Buzuleciu on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Stephen Harklerode on Mar 28, 2010Comments: I agree that these new fees they are trying to charge are absurd. The management can not be allowed to do this.Flag
-
5
Name: Joey Tomlinson on Mar 28, 2010Comments: I agree. The parking is terrible here and these new rules will make it even worse. When you're paying 800 plus a month to live somewhere, parking should not be extra. I love Windsor crossing, but these rules are unacceptable.Flag
-
6
Name: Santiago Ramirez on Mar 28, 2010Comments: I disagree with the new parking rules, too. I shouldn't have to pay rent for my vehicles also. I already pay rent to live here that should cover the parking expense. I was ok with the option to purchase your own parking, because it is an option. And if you don't like the first come first serve basis parking well then purchase your own space and you will not have to worry about it. However making me pay for something that I don't need or want is not American!Flag
-
7
Name: Martin Plante on Mar 28, 2010Comments: I agree that this action by AIMCO is unacceptable. Rent is high enough as it is without having to pay to park to live here. The $75 additional one time fee per year for the second car is nothing more than legalized larceny, not to mention the $970/mo rent without any incidentals. This is not going to motivate me to tell anyone I know to consider living here.Flag
-
8
Name: Thomas Petro on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Anna Merryman on Mar 28, 2010Comments: if you are going to charge...buy land, pay for a security company, and a shuttle bus to run every 3 minutes to take us to our vehicles; sounds stupid yes, but so do these outrages fees.the only thing your going to do is lose more tenants once their lease is up!!!Flag
-
10
Name: Andy Pope on Mar 28, 2010Comments: These parking rules are riduculous, just another way to squeeze every last dime out of us that they can!Flag
-
11
Name: Crystal Tysdal on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: LInda Plante on Mar 28, 2010Comments: This whole parking issue is so grievous! When we first moved here each family had access to one reserved spot and the other car could park anywhere. When AIMCO changed that and made available the option to pay $10 for one reserved spot, it was then that problems began. Neighbors were pitted against neighbors (especially if someone parked in your reserved spot) and NOW, this will only be compounded and make matters worse because every spot will be "reserved" with a hefty price tag attached to it. So much for living in a "friendly" apartment complex! My only hope is that AIMCO will rescind this terrible "Resident Parking" plan.Flag
-
13
Name: Johnathan Tysdal on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Monique Y. Lomax-Track on Mar 28, 2010Comments: Parking here has always been a problem. With the rent that we are paying (which is hard enough when you are on a limited income), there should be one spot assigned per apartment and then charge $10 for a second. This proposed increase is ridiculous and larcenous; I don't think this is the way to keep tenants! It is because of this that I am forced to break my lease ( causing me to be deeper in debt) and have to move in with friends. Something needs to change! This should not be allowed to happen. Bad move management! Does the corporate office approve of this?Flag
-
15
Name: Tamara on Mar 28, 2010Comments: I understand Management is just trying to find a solution to the parking situation which was already a problem to begin with. What I don't understand is how they think charging people for something that SHOULD already be included in the exorbitant rent will pacify people. Honestly, they are worried only about money which is evident in the outdated and crappy appliances, the paper thin walls, and black mold around all the windows. But I digress, this is about parking...I don't think this is a solution we can all live with. Back to the drawing board management.Flag
-
16
Name: Michelle Lage on Mar 28, 2010Comments: I do not believe this should need to be pointed out to your organization at this time, but people are having enough of a difficult time financially. To raise these parking fees, especially at this time, is truly ludicrous. I hope you see fit to reconsider.Flag
-
17
Name: Bette on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Ismael Varela on Mar 28, 2010Comments: Great idea, i strongly agree with this :-)Flag
-
19
Name: Joshua Adam Smith on Mar 28, 2010Comments: thank youFlag
-
20
Name: Mindi Chavez on Mar 28, 2010Comments: I think its is crazy to pay extra for parking, whats next? If they start making us pay for parking, this what will it be next year and the year after that we need to put our foot down! I say get RID of that crappy tennis court and make more parkingFlag
-
21
Name: Devin Berry on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Aaron Mckay on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Naomi Richardson on Mar 28, 2010Comments: My lease states you will provide me with 1 safe parking space. You cannot then change this rule to make it a paid parking space. I have not seen nor agreed to an addendum. My lease is near renewal and this is the perfect vehicle to shop aroudFlag
-
24
Name: Glenda & Scott Miller on Mar 28, 2010Comments: We have been residents for 3 years and a year prior we were at Woods of Williamsburg, also an Aimco property. For some reason the rules in Williamsburg were very different, and the policy worked! We all had one assigned space - and either car registered to that apartment could use that space. This idea of paying $10-$25 per month is totally ridiculous and we can assure you that we will be looking for a new home if this takes place. Getting rid of commerical vehicles and not having motorcycles take up a space the size of a car are two ideas that make more sense. Perhaps some spaces sized just for motorcycles as well as people who own both a motorcycle and a car doing as some already do and parking both in one space might help the situation. Removing unauthorized residents - those living in apartments and parking cars without being on the lease - would also be helpful. This new rule seems only to fatten the pockets of Aimco without solving any problems - unless a higher vacancy rate is the desired outcome.Flag
-
25
Name: Phil McLaughlin on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Jasenka Guyer on Mar 28, 2010Comments: This is an outrageous way to make money.Flag
-
27
Name: Leesa Pope on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Corey Terry on Mar 28, 2010Comments: I don't agree with the parking fee increase. This appears to be another ploy for apartment management to get more from the tenants. Do not increase the parking rate!Flag
-
29
Name: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2010Comments: Look lets be honest here how many people use the Tennis court, or the gazzibos in the little land islands. I think its cool they got a dog lot and I don't own one. If they got rid of the tennis court and maybe shortened the islands they would probably get about 20 more spots. I have 2 vehicles and I am in a 1 bedroom but I paid for one of the reserved spots. It all is about supply and demand they saw that their was a problem so they just figured lets make some more money.Flag
-
30
Name: Jeff Mercado on Mar 28, 2010Comments: As residents who recently needed to break our lease early and were held to every fee agreement in the lease, we are outraged that they think the can alter the lease agreement by adding unreasonable parking fees. Where is my guaranteed parking space under my lease? We would question if this action by management is even legal?Flag
-
31
Name: David Rhoades on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Jennifer Rhoades on Mar 28, 2010Comments: I think is bs that all of a sudden we are being forced to pay for something that the contract we all signed when we moved in here, stated was free.Flag
-
33
Name: Leah Moore on Mar 28, 2010Comments: MOVING!Flag
-
34
Name: Cynthia Charles on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: E McMurrey on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Kendall Girten on Mar 28, 2010Comments: I agree the parking rules are ridiculous. I do not want to pay for a parking spot. If "assigned parking" is mandatory for everyone, then just assign us a spot, we do not need to pay. The complex just needs more parking spaces, and should figure out a way to may more.Flag
-
37
Name: Josh Girten on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Wendy Gauger on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Kathryn Hill on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Robin Hayes on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Scotty Hayes on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Jocelyn Slone on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Theresa Culbertson on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Hillary Perez on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Adam Perez on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Andrew Weiss on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Mathew Fortune on Mar 28, 2010Comments: I agree this is rediculous, there should be 1 assigned parking space per unit as part of the rent and the rest open to visitors or second vehicle.Flag
-
49
Name: Laura Michalski on Mar 29, 2010Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Mitch Shirey on Mar 29, 2010Comments:Flag
Page: 1, 2