Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 708 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 15 »

  1. 1
    Name: Fae Thornton on May 31, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Matthew Swihart on May 31, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Priya Vadehra on May 31, 2008
    Comments: Good for the earth and economy
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Kenneth Waters on May 31, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Alankar Gupta on May 31, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Jane Farrell on May 31, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Louise C Gupta on May 31, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Anonymous on May 31, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: W. Douglas Smith on Jun 1, 2008
    Comments: This is an efficient pay-as-you-go operation that has net gain from the first instillation. Get the U.S. off of the Saudi energy grid. Support WEC and sustainable energy for a sustainable future.
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: LEENA GUPTA on Jun 1, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 1, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 2, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Dysa Kafoury on Jun 2, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Earl D. Carter on Jun 2, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Richard L Kerby on Jun 2, 2008
    Comments: Suggest expansion to cover Wave and Tidal Turbines as Pacific NW has earnest need for this type of alternative power source.
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Ed Foxworth on Jun 2, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Arlene Wade on Jun 2, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Michelle L Cooper on Jun 3, 2008
    Comments: Do not sell, give, or otherwise use my name in any other activity.
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Harish Srivastava on Jun 12, 2008
    Comments: A very good idea.It has lot of merit.
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Steve Jagels on Jun 19, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: W. Douglas Smith on Jun 21, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Louis Magor on Jun 25, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Claire Blackwell on Jun 25, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 25, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: David Hoffman on Jun 25, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: William H. Osinski on Jun 25, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: KEvin G. Gallagher on Jun 25, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Samuel Bechara on Jun 25, 2008
    Comments: This would help reduce our dependence on foreign oil, reduce CO2 emisions, and improve the countries security
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Samuel Bechara on Jun 25, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Joe Steinberger on Jun 25, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 25, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Barbie Swihart Stutzman on Jun 25, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Rona Sass on Jun 25, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Evan Goldstein on Jun 26, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Ana Gutierrez on Jun 26, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Don Immel on Jun 29, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Marsha Hedrick on Jun 29, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Rudy Hillinga on Jul 7, 2008
    Comments: The US can no longer procastrenate and put $400 billion annually into the hands of "outsiders, " who often use the monies to finance actions detrimental to our national interest, while we now have the technology to produce wind and other alternative forms of energy, compatible with present high cost and CO2 contaminating fossil fuels.
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 7, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Joan Lawson on Jul 8, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 11, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Ken Eberly on Jul 11, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Adam Chalmers on Jul 11, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 11, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 11, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Jose Ortiz on Jul 12, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Russell Luke on Jul 12, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Kellie Nickole on Jul 13, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 13, 2008
    Comments: The only problem with the money earned in excess being returned to the Social Security administration is that not all citizens benefit from this fund. Ronald Regan's administration created legislation preventing many public servants from collecting from this fund despite their contributions ( in my case more than 30 years). As an educator, this legislation sees my benefitting from this fund as "double dipping" since I participate in a teacher retirement plan which I have also had to pay in to. This is despite the fact that military personnel are allowed to retire, collect their retirement (at an earlier age) then work towards SS benefits as well. I would want that changed if profits are to be paid to a fund I can't presently benefit from.
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 13, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 15 »

Sponsored links