Stop the build on Wearyall Hill

Signatures 171 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 › »

1. 1
   Name: Liz Veldkamp on Jun 14, 2005

   State:

   Country: NL

   Comments: Please help us stop the build, help safe the beauty of Wearyall Hill!

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Maarten Duvekot on Jun 14, 2005

   State:

   Country: NL

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Torc, P.A.C. Bloos on Jun 14, 2005

   State:

   Country: NL

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Liz Pearce on Jun 14, 2005

   State:

   Country: UK

   Comments: I have seen where these houses are planned to go and it involves blasting away a huge part of wearyall hill and shoring it up with concrete. This plan is obscene and the fact that it has been passed by the council is appalling. It must not go ahead.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Dafydd Monks on Jun 14, 2005

   State:

   Country: UK

   Comments: This is farcical - this must be stopped NOW!

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Daniel Greywolf on Jun 14, 2005

   State:

   Country: UK

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Jennifer MacCormack on Jun 14, 2005

   State:

   Country: US

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Phil Ryder on Jun 14, 2005

   State:

   Country: UK

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Mark Rosher on Jun 14, 2005

   State:

   Country: UK

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Barrrie Jenks on Jun 14, 2005

    State:

    Country: UK

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Kristal McCauley on Jun 14, 2005

    State:

    Country: UK

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Maaike Frese on Jun 14, 2005

    State:

    Country: NL

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Rick Vitton on Jun 14, 2005

    State: IL

    Country: US

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Helen Cadywold on Jun 14, 2005

    State:

    Country: UK

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Bill Blank on Jun 14, 2005

    State: MO

    Country: US

    Comments: Pitch your tents on the hill and don't move for anyone!

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Larry Rzepka on Jun 14, 2005

    State:

    Country: US

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Faye Boyd on Jun 14, 2005

    State:

    Country: CA

    Comments: building on sacred sites is not morally ethical.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Robb Hawklord on Jun 14, 2005

    State:

    Country:

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Julia Brownlow on Jun 14, 2005

    State:

    Country:

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Brian Harkins on Jun 14, 2005

    State:

    Country: UK

    Comments: What and where will they build next,perchance someone would like a penthouse suit atop the Tor.Does the Mendip council NOT wish Tourism.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Marjolein Tamis on Jun 14, 2005

    State:

    Country: NL

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Natasja Boekhoudt on Jun 14, 2005

    State:

    Country: NL

    Comments: dont you dare do this. this is absolutly out of the queastion. you cant murder something thats is part of history and sacred

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: David Collins on Jun 14, 2005

    State:

    Country: CA

    Comments: Although I'm from Canada, I visited Glastonbury when I was in the U.K. a year and a half ago, and it was one of the most memorable places I've been to. Building a bunch of houses on a hill which many people visit is a sure way to start ruining a lovely location. Besides, isn't the religious significance attributed by anyone to the Vatican, or to Mecca also "all in the mind"...

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Susa Black on Jun 15, 2005

    State: CA

    Country: US

    Comments: Wearyall Hill is an incredibly significent place to the history of Britain. Please do not tamper with it!!

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: John Black on Jun 15, 2005

    State: CA

    Country: US

    Comments: Obviously the Mendip District Council has no clue. It is good business to destroy tourist attractions like Wearyall Hill to build houses for middle management tossers.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Cora Van Leeuwen on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: NL

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Heleen Tuithof on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: NL

    Comments: This site is important for many of us witches and druids.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Mathew B. on Jun 15, 2005

    State: TX

    Country: US

    Comments: Why is it that people feel the need to destroy ancient sites First Tera now Glastonbury. Please stop the destruction people.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Remco Reis on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: NL

    Comments: This cannot happen. Too many holy sites have already been destroyed. It ends here!

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: David Cadywold on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: UK

    Comments: DO NOT DESTROY WEARYALL HILL

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Annemiek De Bruijn on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: NL

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Sanna Heijnis on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: NL

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Renee Smits on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: NL

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Kira Westfall on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country:

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Esther De Jong on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: NL

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Daniel Mack on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: UK

    Comments: Wearyall hill is a place of peace and beauty. It is certainly a place of spiritual significance to me, one part of the overall significance of Glastonbury as a whole. I cannot believe that building homes here will benefit the site.

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Meaghan Paton on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country:

    Comments: SAVE

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Alison Jones on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country:

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Jill Willmott on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: UK

    Comments: Wearyall hill Is important to Christians as it is the site of the Original Holy Thorn planted by Joseph of Aramathea. Building here would be sacrilege.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Edward Walker on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: UK

    Comments: How many palms have been greased this time

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Julia Minnear on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: UK

    Comments: Glastonbury won't stand for it!

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Raevyn Carney on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country:

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Elaine Taylor on Jun 15, 2005

    State:

    Country: UK

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Ruth M Dombross on Jun 15, 2005

    State: FL

    Country: US

    Comments: History should be preserved.

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Eric Scotton on Jun 16, 2005

    State: CA

    Country: US

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Belinda Sinnott on Jun 16, 2005

    State:

    Country:

    Comments: This is a huge part of my heritage and history

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Wayne Campbell on Jun 16, 2005

    State:

    Country: US

    Comments: As a Member of the Clan Campbell of North America, I say No don't build them.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Theresa Jensen on Jun 16, 2005

    State: CA

    Country: US

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Jill Earlam on Jun 16, 2005

    State:

    Country: UK

    Comments: This is of great significance and should not be built on.

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: DeEstle Arthur on Jun 16, 2005

    State:

    Country: US

    Comments: I find even the thought of building here abhorrant. Please, reconsider - there is plenty of land on the Isles for that. This is not the place.

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 › »