Signatures 116 total
-
51
Name: Justin Ratliff on Jan 2, 2013Comments:Flag
-
52
Name: B. Kieth Cooper on Jan 2, 2013Comments: Retired USNFlag
-
53
Name: Wade Frechette on Jan 2, 2013Comments: I oppose Senator Feinstein's proposed "assault" weapons banFlag
-
54
Name: Sean Thomas on Jan 2, 2013Comments: Don't tread on me.Flag
-
55
Name: Geoffrey Hoffman on Jan 2, 2013Comments:Flag
-
56
Name: Richard L. Bitter Jr. on Jan 2, 2013Comments:Flag
-
57
Name: Cody Sabo on Jan 2, 2013Comments:Flag
-
58
Name: Bob Fisher on Jan 2, 2013Comments: Enforce the laws on the books. No new laws!Flag
-
59
Name: Devin Cowperthwaite on Jan 2, 2013Comments: no more gun control!Flag
-
60
Name: Dustin Helvik on Jan 2, 2013Comments:Flag
-
61
Name: Anonymous on Jan 2, 2013Comments:Flag
-
62
Name: RICK SCHROEDER on Jan 2, 2013Comments:Flag
-
63
Name: Everett Adcock on Jan 2, 2013Comments: Many of our forefathers were from areas where the only arms were in the hands of the “Gentry” and the subjects were not allowed to be armed. The government established in these United States of America was based on individual freedom and high self-reliance. Much of both, to what should be our great shame, have been eroded and chipped away at by legislation. The 2nd Amendment is about arming our militia (military) and every citizen is obligated to be a part of that military for both defense of country and thereby defense of self. Citizens without the same right to bear arms and right to bear the same arms, as do those that would govern them, are no longer citizens, but simply subjects of another ruler. Without the means to adequately defend yourself, your family, and your country, from those that would do harm to any one of them, sets you up as just another victim. Thinking that someone else can or will do it for you (the government, the police, whatever) makes you just another fool.Flag
-
64
Name: Martin Cabrera on Jan 2, 2013Comments: thanksFlag
-
65
Name: Jonathan Shaw on Jan 2, 2013Comments: The original intent of the second amendment is so the people can prevent a tyrannical government from taking hold. It is the ultimate check and balance. It authorizes the use of deadly force against a government that becomes out of control, and is no longer of, by, and for the people. This nullifies the argument that people don't need assault rifles for hunting or target shooting or home defense. The founding fathers had just witnessed what can happen when a government gets out of control, and no longer stands for the people, and fought hard to free us from the grips of it. They then put this amendment in place to ensure it couldn't happen again. It seems that to much time has passed since then, and people have begun to take liberty for granted.Flag
-
66
Name: Anthony Keen on Jan 2, 2013Comments: veteranFlag
-
67
Name: Daniel Paquette on Jan 2, 2013Comments:Flag
-
68
Name: Carlisle McCutcheon on Jan 2, 2013Comments:Flag
-
69
Name: Russ Larson-private Citizen on Jan 2, 2013Comments: DO NOT take away my fundamental right to protect myself and my family!Flag
-
70
Name: Chris Hall on Jan 2, 2013Comments:Flag
-
71
Name: Mark Dziewa on Jan 2, 2013Comments:Flag
-
72
Name: William Erwin on Jan 2, 2013Comments: I will not be disarmed.So that only means one thing.You figure out what that one thing is.Flag
-
73
Name: Ian on Jan 2, 2013Comments:Flag
-
74
Name:
Charles Werner on Jan 3, 2013
Comments:Flag -
75
Name: Anonymous on Jan 3, 2013Comments: Banning guns will do nothing except give criminals a better chance to get away with their crime. The second amendment was not for us to hunt (which is what most politicians think). It is so that we can defend ourselves from a tyranist government (which is what we have right now but no one is doing anything). The 2nd amendment shall not be infringed.Flag
-
76
Name: Rick R. Larson on Jan 3, 2013Comments: The Constitution to the United States is a document, which should be taken as a whole, and not something to be interpreted, pieced or censored by whomever and however they see fit. Much like the Bible, it must be taken as it is written. You believe and accept it all, or it is worthless. The freedoms guaranteed in both were bought with blood, the sacrifices of life, liberty and justice for all men must not be in vain.Flag
-
77
Name: Glenn M. Buchinger on Jan 3, 2013Comments:Flag
-
78
Name: Dean Haggerty on Jan 3, 2013Comments: Why does the Federal and State governments ALWAYS try to punish the law abiding citizens when a CRIMINAL acts.Flag
-
79
Name: Glenn M. Buchinger on Jan 3, 2013Comments: I DO NOT support this proposed legislation. I think its absolutely reprehensible that politicians use the death of little children to push their private agendas.Flag
-
80
Name:
Tiffany Nicole Farmer on Jan 7, 2013
Comments: Plz help stop them from taking the rights that aren't there's to take!!! Democrats or republican.....gun owner or not.....please take the time to think about the consequences of these actions if we allow them to take away the right to protect our children and our self!!!Flag -
81
Name: James Mabe on Jan 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
82
Name: ALEXANDER ONETTO ALL RIGHTS RESERVED on Jan 8, 2013Comments: UNORGANIZED MILITIAFlag
-
83
Name: Michael W Jordan on Jan 10, 2013Comments:Flag
-
84
Name: Michal Koperny on Jan 10, 2013Comments:Flag
-
85
Name: Shep Cook on Jan 11, 2013Comments:Flag
-
86
Name: Sarah Ibsen on Jan 11, 2013Comments:Flag
-
87
Name: Chris Glad on Jan 11, 2013Comments:Flag
-
88
Name: Kevin M. Davis on Jan 11, 2013Comments:Flag
-
89
Name: Dick Selby on Jan 11, 2013Comments:Flag
-
90
Name:
Robert Edmondson on Jan 11, 2013
Comments:Flag -
91
Name: Bob Pickett on Jan 11, 2013Comments: the criminally insane will still get guns to kill those who are innocent victimsFlag
-
92
Name: James McClatchey on Jan 11, 2013Comments:Flag
-
93
Name: Giovanni Heward on Jan 11, 2013Comments:Flag
-
94
Name: Crys Hale on Jan 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
95
Name: Shawndra Green on Jan 13, 2013Comments: Even if you ban rifles, there are plenty of other ways to destroy a life.Flag
-
96
Name: Russell Nash on Jan 13, 2013Comments: veteranFlag
-
97
Name: Russell Nash on Jan 13, 2013Comments: veteranFlag
-
98
Name: Bob A on Jan 15, 2013Comments: Gun bans have never solved anything and a lot of gun laws haven't either. It's very well put that you CAN'T BAN EVIL. However, take more guns out of the picture and evil will prevail. It's my opinion, it's evil people who ban the guns so that evil can prevail more. Ask this question, why hasn't our President acted on protecting our children? He wants to put a ban on guns. Another gun-free zone shooting will happen and he'll ban more guns. Pretty soon, law abiding citizens of the USA will only be permitted to own one SINGLE shot shotgun - that's it. That is the left sides agenda. They want more evil to happen so they can control our lives and take our freedom away.Flag
-
99
Name: Michael Dugger on Jan 16, 2013Comments:Flag
-
100
Name: Anonymous on Jan 16, 2013Comments:Flag