CAMPAIGN FOR 3 HOUR WATCHMEN MOVIE FROM WARNER BROS

Signatures 6582 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 132 › »

1. 151
   Name: Ian Frederickson on Aug 15, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Martin Gonzalez on Aug 15, 2008

   Comments: Make the run time as long as it has to be. Make the run time 5 hours if you have too. Just don't do anything to detract from what truly is a great work of literature. Don't leave anything out, every detail and every panel in the graphic novel can not stand alone without the rest. With Watchmen...it is all or nothing.

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Carl Berger on Aug 15, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Phil D on Aug 15, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Jonathan Okun on Aug 15, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Fasiq Al-Kufr on Aug 15, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Jaska Numminen on Aug 15, 2008

   Comments: As it seems now, I'm gonna only see one movie next year, so I might aswell spend 3 hours on it instead of two and a half.

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: David D on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Andrew Pruitt on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: It's a shame that more often than not the studios behind movie adaptions feel that they cannot run over a certain length of time. Any good work will take as much time as it needs. Besides, if I'm going to see a movie, it better be good enough and long enough to justify the $20 it costs.

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: Do NOT cut the movie down.

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Gavin Youngberg on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: That extra half an hour helps out alot, really.

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Greg Wagner on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: This wonderful graphic novel can barely all be contained in a 3 hour runtime, let alone 2 and a half hours. Do not take out any of the story. And make it run 3 hours or longer.

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Mae Catt on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Tony Parkerson on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: If possible, longer than 3 hours would be great, but we get what we can, I guess.

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Josh Goring on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: If any superhero film deserves a running time of 3 hours, its this one. Please WB, you have our full support to extend the running time.

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Leandra Rhenisch on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Michael Anton on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: A squid would be nice, too...

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: John Rayborn on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: The Comic is awesome, lets make the movie awesome too

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Christopher James on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: Anything less than 3 hours is not good enough. Shame on you for even trying.

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: 3 HOURS!!!

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Brian Carnell on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: The Dark Knight has proven once again that people will sit through a long movie if it's good. Watchmen is the most revered graphic novel in the world. It absolutley deserves a 3 hour running time!

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Margarita K. on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: Signed for a good cause.

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Al Starks on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$You could always let them adapt a film the fans will embrace and celebrate for the rest of history and it will be imortal. Look at Lord of the Rings. CASH XD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Brian Kato on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Ash on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Kurt Walker on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: Werd to your mother

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Nathan Hubbell on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Austin on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: As an average movie go-er and as a fan of the graphic novel it needs to be three hours. It needs to be.

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Jacob Carson on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Farrad Mahdi on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: Let the move do as much justice to the source material as possible.

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Tony Thorne on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: Yes, definitely 3 hours is necessary for such a dense, layered work. I wouldn't care if it was 4 hours long, I would still stay and watch it.

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Matthew Woolley on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Raul Leal on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: Use all the time you need for the movie. The comic is amazing, don't ruin the movie by cutting out parts.

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: As with any film published these days, I will watch it in cinema when it gets good reviews and promises to be memorable. I rarely go to the cinema because so many films are ultimately just a rehash of "proven" profitable themes and cut down to a suitable format and running time for the lowest common denominator. There are films out there that prove that this is not a necessity, provided the film is actually considered good. The Lord of the Rings trilogy proved that a good film can be profitable, even when it runs well over 3 hours in the cinematic release. But even so, if Zack Snyder's work feels right at 3 hours, why even consider trimming it down Does Warner Bros want to produce a good, memorable film adaptation of one of the defining works for the comic genre, or is it ultimately only about the bottom-line Does Warner Bros really consider the potential audience for Watchmen to be the same kind of people who go to the cinema to see flicks such as "Juno" or "Alvin and the Chipmunks". We don't want to be entertained for a quick one and a half hours, we want to be overwhelmed.

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: This movie has got to be at least 3 hours! There's too much story! Cutting it down might get more showings in, but how much impact will the film itself have if the core fan base is uninterested in a simplified version of the movie. WATCHMEN is poised to become a classic. One that will be a money maker for you folks at WB for decades to come. In the same way other WB classics have done so like THE MALTESE FALCON. That is IF the film is done right. Zack Snyder and crew have accomplished this. They have filmed the unfilmable. Let them release the version that does the material justice. They know what they're doing. Have faith in them. Thanks!

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Luciano Subira on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: It's gotta be 3 hours! Got. To. Be.

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: John Bobbington on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Adrian Thiessen on Aug 15, 2008

    Comments: DO IT YOU MUST

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 132 › »