Vote of NO CONFIDENCE in Bishop Arthur Roche

Signatures 199 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4 › »

1. 101
   Name: Giuseppe Vettori on Aug 17, 2008

   Comments: Oremus pro Pontifice nostro Benedicto

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: F K Girling on Aug 17, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Padre Attilio Erdas on Aug 17, 2008

   Comments: Kyrie eleison Kyrie eleison Kyrie eleison

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: David Joyce on Aug 17, 2008

   Comments: Partake in the building up of Christendom, not its destruction.

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Gloria C. Molinari on Aug 17, 2008

   Comments: I'm deeply ashamed! I'm sorry you have a bishop like that! May God help you!

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Ram on Aug 17, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Marco Antonio Echeverr on Aug 17, 2008

   Comments: Necesitamos con urgencia Santos Obispos, que sigan con obediencia al Santo Padre Benedicto. Ojal

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Paul Hellyer on Aug 17, 2008

   Comments: Bishop Roche lacks leadership skills and courage. He can't even reply to our letters. Instead of closing churches & gallivanting off to Sydney a totally expensive and time wasting exercise. He should be organising the launch of an evangelising initiative to spread Christianity to our fellow countrymen and to preach the truth of Christ to our poor benighted Muslims. Then our Churches would be full and young men would come forward to the Priesthood. Also he should see that the whole Faith is taught in our Catholic schools. Not the watered down protestanised version the poor kids get now. As to shortage of priests . .well this is just a red herring so he can rake in more cash. In reality there are thousands of Polish priest who would love to come to Britain and start reversing the decline in Faith and practice.

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Luis Fern on Aug 17, 2008

   Comments: St. John the Evangelist parish in Allerton Bywater should not be closed. Bishop Arthur Roche must listen to the parishoners. If he doesn't, the Papal Nuncio and / or the Congregation for Clergy should take charge of this situation and dismiss Bishop Roche from his duties.

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Raffaele Sias on Aug 17, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Eduardo Risco Del Valle on Aug 17, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Denis Collins on Aug 18, 2008

    Comments: I wish to support the Catholics of Leeds. I would ask the Holy Father to intervene directly and spare them from the arbitrary decisions of their Bishop.

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Leonardo Jose Silvestre on Aug 18, 2008

    Comments: Lament

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Maurizio F. on Aug 18, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Mariano Mancuso on Aug 18, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Lucia Vergara on Aug 18, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Antony Gray on Aug 18, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Stefano Barbieri on Aug 19, 2008

    Comments: ad majorem Dei gloriam

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Gian Carlo Portigliotti on Aug 19, 2008

    Comments: Bishop ad infera : non prevalebit

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008

    Comments: Fate ricorso alla Segnatura apostolica!

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Andrea Silva on Aug 19, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Marcus Williams on Aug 19, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Sacerdote Bernardo Trelle on Aug 19, 2008

    Comments: Prego il Signore che vi illumini. Spero che si riapra la parrocchia ingiustamente chiusa. don Bernardo (Italia)

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Alessandro Giunti on Aug 20, 2008

    Comments: Vergogna!

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Antonio on Aug 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Michele Bendazzoli on Aug 20, 2008

    Comments: Freedoom to pray

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Enrico M. Remondini on Aug 20, 2008

    Comments: What kind of comments can we make Don't we see the attempt to destroy the Catholic Church from the inside Shall we say something even more openly

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: S on Aug 20, 2008

    Comments: We must pray to Our Lord !

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: PAOLO GOLE' on Aug 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Kathryn Such on Aug 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Ian Such on Aug 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Federico Catani on Aug 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Giovanni Paracchini on Aug 21, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Gianluca Venturini on Aug 21, 2008

    Comments: carry on!

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Nicola Bonora on Aug 21, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Rosario Ruffa on Aug 21, 2008

    Comments: INSTAURARE OMNIA IN CHRISTO

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Antonietta Taras on Aug 21, 2008

    Comments: Che vergogna.

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Filiberto Pierami on Aug 21, 2008

    Comments: No, No, No!!!!!!!!!!!

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Guido Ferro Canale on Aug 21, 2008

    Comments: Exsurge, Domine, et iudica causam tuam!

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Andrea Lambertenghi on Aug 22, 2008

    Comments: W Ges

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Guido Blotto on Aug 22, 2008

    Comments: More churches, more places where Jesus, our Lord is really present.

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Francis Barletta on Aug 22, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Fabrizio on Aug 24, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Tiziano on Aug 24, 2008

    Comments: This person should be reduced to lay state! This is supposed to be a prince of the Church Be brave faithfuls of Allerton, all true catholics are with you.

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Elisabetta on Aug 25, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 27, 2008

    Comments: It's a ridiculous situation and I empathise with the parishioners!

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 28, 2008

    Comments: Scandalous!

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4 › »